Neodymantis, Kment, Petr & Rider, David A., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4058.2.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6D77B01B-45C2-47E9-8A14-BA51CEDA5370 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6106604 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/725087B3-C157-AF3E-27AE-AA46FABA71FB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neodymantis |
status |
gen. nov. |
Neodymantis gen. nov.
( Figures 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 )
Dymantis (misidentification, partim): Stål (1861): 199 (key to genera), 200 (species included); Stål (1865): 79 (key to genera), 110–111 (redescription, species included); Stål (1876): 51 –52 (key to genera, catalogue); Lethierry & Severin (1893): 109 (catalogue, distribution); Hesse (1925): 18 –19 (catalogue); Distant (1898): 298 (comparison with Pretorius Distant, 1898); Kirkaldy (1909): 182 (catalogue, type species designation); Hesse (1925): 18 –19 (catalogue; type species designation).
Dymantis (misidentification): Villiers (1952a): 66 –67 (diagnosis, figure); Gillon (1972a): 269, 271, 273, 277, 278, 281, 290, 298, 318–320 (redescription, key to adults, key to larvae, egg, larva, figures); Linnavuori (1982): 66 –70 (redescription, key to genera and species, phylogenetic relationships, taxonomy, figures); Gapon & Ribes (2005): 62 –66 (morphology, taxonomy, figures); Robertson (2009): 275 –276 (catalogue, distribution).
Type species. Halys planus Fabricius, 1803 , here designated.
Diagnosis. The genus was keyed and comprehensive diagnosis was provided by Linnavuori (1982: 67–68) as follows: ‘Body robust. Head parabolic; gena extending slightly beyond tylus, not recurved mesad apically, apex of tylus therefore not concealed. 2nd rostral joint much longer than 3rd and 4th joints together, 3rd joint tumid. Lateral margins of pronotum slightly curved or nearly straight, humeral angles rounded. Under surface of femora with small setigerous tubercles. Scent gland orifices (Fig. 86f) very small, evaporatoria large, opaque, ± punctate. Male genitalia: Pygofer robust; ventral surface usually with ± distinct setose medio-apical tubercle. Hypophysis of style digitate, basal plate large and provided with numerous long hairs. Theca very large, globose. Spermathecal bulb (Fig. 84d) simple.’
Etymology. The new name is composed of the prefix Neo - (= new) and Dymantis ; the gender is feminine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Neodymantis
Kment, Petr & Rider, David A. 2015 |
Dymantis
Robertson 2009: 275 |
Gapon 2005: 62 |
Linnavuori 1982: 66 |
Gillon 1972: 269 |
Villiers 1952: 66 |
Dymantis
Hesse 1925: 18 |
Hesse 1925: 18 |
Kirkaldy 1909: 182 |
Distant 1898: 298 |
Lethierry 1893: 109 |
Stal 1876: 51 |
Stal 1865: 79 |
Stal 1861: 199 |