Urnula subcrateria J. R. Lu, F. M. Yu & Q. Zhao, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.619.1.4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8431558 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7264F635-AF23-B559-FF56-FB4AFE283C52 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Urnula subcrateria J. R. Lu, F. M. Yu & Q. Zhao |
status |
sp. nov. |
Urnula subcrateria J. R. Lu, F. M. Yu & Q. Zhao sp. nov. Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3
Index Fungorum number: IF 900886; FacesofFungi number: FOF 14798
Etymology: “ subcrateria ” refers to the similarity of the type species to Urnula craterium .
Holotype: HKAS129214 View Materials
Diagnosis. Urnula subcrateria is morphologically similar to U. craterium (Schwein.) Fr. , but can easily be distinguished by its shorter stipe and smaller asci and ascospores.
Description:
Apothecia cupulate to funnel-like, 3.5–5 cm diam. and 2–3.5 cm high, subsessile to stipitate, texture leathery, a margin crenulate to odontoid and frequently deflexed at maturity. Hymenium surface glabrous, brownish black. External surface brown to dark brown, velvety, covered with small irregular flakelike, yellowish to brown patches of tissue. Stipe short and mainly subterranean, but sometimes well developed, covered at the base by a thick subiculum.
External hairs two types: 1) hyphoid, short, cylindrical, septate, subhyaline, light gray to yellowish brown, 2–4 μm in diameter, surface smooth but occasionally dotted by brown to dark brown spots; 2) true hairs which are longer, 4–8 μm in diameter, the true hair-wall about 0.5–1 μm thick, brown to dark brown, undulated, and dotted densely by many small tubercles. Ectacl excipulum 70–100 μm thick, of textura globosa to textura angularis, cells 5–28 μm wide and/or long, yellowish brown. Medullary excipulum 185–310 μm thick, yellowish, of textura intricata within a gelatinous matrix, hyphae hyaline, 1–8.5 μm in diameter with 0.5–1.5 μm wall. Asci cylindrical, 455–642 × 10.5–18 μm, basal parts long-stipe-like, non-amyloid, 8-spored. Ascospores uniseriate, ellipsoidal to short clavate, sometimes slightly bent, rounded at both ends, numerous small warts on the surface of immature spores, smooth when mature, (18.5–)20.5–37(–40) × 10–13.5(–15.5) μm (n= 40, Q =1.5–3.5), with walls up to 0.5–1.5 μm thick; some small. Paraphyses filiform, not or slightly extending the length of the asci, 2.5–5.5 μm in diameter, septate, flexuous, upper part generally branched and embedded in a pale brown pigment, tips simple to branched.
Habitat: On soil humus layer in a humid subtropical forest with many fallen leaves, mosses, and lichens.
Distribution: Currently only known in Yunnan, China.
Material examined: CHINA, Yunnan Province, Dali City, Eryuan County, alt. 3294 m, 16 Apr. 2019, Feng-Ming Yu, FM 19-1 ( HKAS129214 ); same location, 16 Apr. 2019, Feng-Ming Yu, FM 19-4 ( HKAS129215 ).
Notes: Urnula subcrateria is characterized by its cupulate to funnel-like apothecia, subsessile to stipitate, brownish-black hymenium with glabrous surface, two types of external hairs, long-stipe asci, and ellipsoidal to short clavate ascospores. Morphology, U. subcrateria shares similarities with U. criterium (HMAS 33642) in its dark brown to nearly black hymenium, brown to dark brown or nearly black external surface with yellowish to brown patches of tissue. However, compared with U. subcrateria , U. criterium has well-developed stipe, sometimes up to 1.3–1.8 cm in dry materials, and has shorter asci (455–642 μm vs. 280–330 μm) and slimmer paraphyses (2.5–5.5 μm vs. 2–3 μm) ( Zhuang 2004). In this study, Urnula ailaoshanensis is easily distinguished from U. subcrateria by its reddish-brown to ochre hymenium surface, and having wider asci (21–30 μm vs. 10.5–18 μm) and longer ascospores (11.5–17 μm vs. 10–13.5 μm). Two species form their own strong supporting branches respectively and have enough base differences with their relatives ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |