Luciobarbus barbulus (Heckel, 1847)

Jouladeh-Roudbar, Arash, Ghanavi, Hamid Reza & Doadrio, Ignacio, 2020, Fig. 4 in Fig. 4 in Fig. 3 in Fig. 21. Sesarmops mora n in Paralbunea dayriti, Zoological Studies 59 (21), pp. 1-303 : 80

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2020.59-21

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12823109

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/726C87BD-E204-9C7C-FF4B-578C220FFD61

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Luciobarbus barbulus (Heckel, 1847)
status

 

Luciobarbus barbulus (Heckel, 1847) View in CoL – Native ( Fig. 139)

Barbus barbulus Heckel [J. J.] 1847: 256; Type locality: Kara Agatsch River, Iran; Kueik River at Aleppo, Syria. Syntypes: NMW 6596 (1).

Common name: Pr: Berzom, Charsol, Sas mahi lab pahn, En: Persis barbel, Qarah Aqaj barbel.

Diagnosis: Two pairs of barbels, last unbranched dorsal fin spine serrated and very strong, usually 8 dorsal fin rays (never 10), fleshy and well-developed lips, and 47 or more lateral line scales.

Meristic characters: D: IV 8–9 (8), A: III 5, P: 17–19, V: 8–9 (8), GR: 15–24, LL: 47–59, TV: 44.

Distribution: Tigris and Persis basins ( Fig. 140). Found in Karun, Mond, Sirvan, Jarahi, Zohre, Rudbal, Fahlian, Dez, Qarah Aqaj, Shapor, Jarrahi, Zohre, Zemkan, Dalaki and Gamasiab rivers.

Taxonomy: Coad (1996) placed in Barbus but Esmaeili et al. (2010) transferred to Luciobarbus .

Conservation: IUCN: Not Evaluated, PC: Least Concern. This species has a relatively large distribution range and there is no known widespread threat affecting it. Therefore, we classified it as Least Concern.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF