Leptinopterus gracilis Boileau, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.189228 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6224796 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/727C676A-6A58-FFE2-FF23-FAC3FCCDFC34 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Leptinopterus gracilis Boileau, 1899 |
status |
|
Leptinopterus gracilis Boileau, 1899 View in CoL
( Figs. 9–14 View FIGURES 9 – 14 )
Leptinopterus gracilis Boileau 1899: 196 View in CoL ; Lüderwaldt 1930: 126; Lüderwaldt 1935: 484; Blackwelder 1944: 196; Didier & Séguy 1953: 130 (472); Benesh 1960: 52; Maes 1992: 63; Mizunuma & Nagai 1994: 278, plate 116, (Fig. 467), misidentified illustration of Leptinopterus elegans View in CoL ); Krajcik 2001: 28; Krajcik 2003: 94; Baba 2003: 26 ( Figs. 8–9 View FIGURES 5 – 8 View FIGURES 9 – 14 ), misidentified illustration of Leptinopterus elegans View in CoL , ( Figs. 10–11 View FIGURES 9 – 14 ), misidentified illustration of Leptinopterus erythrocnemus View in CoL ), ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ), (Fig. 36), misidentified illustration of Leptinopterus suturalis View in CoL .
nomen nudum: Leptinopterus elegans View in CoL ab. catharinensis Lüderwaldt 1935: 490 View in CoL .
L. elegans Jakowleff and “ L. elegans ab. catharinensis Lüderwaldt” are misidentified in all the Brazilian collections I studied. After examining a picture of the holotype of L. gracilis Boileau and the label data from MNHN, I conclude that the true L. gracilis is the species from southern Brazil that has been called L. elegans . Specimens labeled L. gracilis probably belong to new species or other species that are not identified in Brazilian collections, and only after studying the remaining types of the genus will be possible to identify this species, or the true L. elegans . After reading the original description of L. elegans by Jakowleff (1900) it is difficult to know which species is being discussed. The type locality is São Paulo State without more precise data, and it is possible that L. elegans is a junior synonym of L. gracilis . “ Leptinopterus catharinensis Lüderwaldt ” was named as an aberrant form of L. elegans , but is actually a specimen of L. gracilis . It appears to be a mandibular variant of the more typical form of L. gracilis and is from the same orographic region. Both forms are collected together, and except for the form of the male mandibles, all other characters, including those of the aedeagus, are exactly the same.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Leptinopterus gracilis Boileau, 1899
Grossi, Paschoal Coelho 2009 |
Leptinopterus gracilis
Krajcik 2003: 94 |
Baba 2003: 26 |
Krajcik 2001: 28 |
Mizunuma 1994: 278 |
Maes 1992: 63 |
Benesh 1960: 52 |
Didier 1953: 130 |
Blackwelder 1944: 196 |
Luderwaldt 1935: 484 |
Luderwaldt 1930: 126 |
Boileau 1899: 196 |