Solenura ania (Walker, 1846)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54961 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/765CF520-6C57-5968-A2EE-064FDAE73576 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Solenura ania (Walker, 1846) |
status |
|
Materials
Type status: Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: Solenuraania; acceptedNameUsage: Solenuraania; parentNameUsage: Solenuraania; order: Hymenoptera; family: Pteromalidae; genus: Solenura; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Henan; locality: Tianjie Mountain ; verbatimLatitude: 35°35′11.53″N; verbatimLongitude: 113°36′5.08″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Liangming Cao; dateIdentified: 2019; Event: eventDate: 2018-07-1; Record Level: language: English; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen GoogleMaps Type status: Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: Solenuraania; acceptedNameUsage: Solenuraania; parentNameUsage: Solenuraania; order: Hymenoptera; family: Pteromalidae; genus: Solenura; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Henan; locality: Tianjie Mountain ; verbatimLatitude: 35°35′11.53″N; verbatimLongitude: 113°36′5.08″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Liangming Cao; dateIdentified: 2019; Event: eventDate: 2018-07-1; Record Level: language: English; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen GoogleMaps
Description
Description of male. Body length 5.92 mm, length of fore wing 3.23 mm (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 a).
Colour: Body green, with metallic tint (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 a). Head with ocelli, scrobal depression and apical 2/3 mandibles black, interantennal triangular region golden, eyes brown (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 b); antennal radicle and basal apex of scape orange; labial and maxillary palpi, dorsal side of fore, mid and hind femora and entire tibiae and tarsi orange to reddish-brown, ventral side of all femora metallic green (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 a); both wings subhyaline, veins and setae dark brown.
Head. In dorsal view, head 1.86 times as broad as long; eyes large, width 0.3 times maximum width of head, interantennal triangular region sharp, ocelli large, anterior ocellus with frontal margin touching scrobal depression, ocello-ocular distance 0.5 times post-ocellar distance (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 a). In frontal view, head 1.2 times as broad as high, eyes 0.65 times head height, frons in narrowest part twice eye breadth; frons and face with strong reticulation; scrobes deep, groove-like, reaching the anterior ocellus and in the form of an inverted V, with scale-like sculpture; outer margin of scrobes parallel with inner margin of eyes; malar sulcus deep, slightly curved; mandibles with two blunt teeth; antennal toruli same level with lower eye margin (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 b). Malar space 0.55 times eye height, posterior margin of eye touching occiput, thus temple undeveloped (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 a, Fig. 2 View Figure 2 a). Antennal radicle 0.13 times scape length; scape slightly curved and broadening in apical half, 3.75 times as long as pedicel, 1st funicular segment 0.5 times 2nd funicular segment; clava 1.6 times as long as last funicular segment.
Mesosoma. Mesosoma with conspicuous and strong punctate reticulation. Pronotal collar quadrate, anterior margin straight, with dense reticulation. Pronotal collar 0.08 times as long as mesoscutum and 0.75 times as long as broad. Mesoscutum 0.65 times as long as broad, mid lobe convex, notauli deep. Axillae large. Scutellum conspicuously convex, 1.3 times as broad as long. Propodeum short, medially 0.25 times length of scutellum, median carina obvious and straight, median area shiny with strong punctuate reticulation; spiracles oval (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 a). In lateral view, prepectus delicately reticulate, with long hairs; mesopleuron setose, reticulate to punctate-alveolate; metapleuron shiny and densely haired (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 a). Fore leg with femur slightly curved and 1.6 times as long as tibia, tarsus 1.38 times as long as tibia, tibia with one spur, which is 0.6 times as long as basitarsus, tarsal segments 1-5 with relative length of 40:30:25:30:28; mid leg with femur slightly bulgy, 0.95 times as long as tibia, tarsus as long as tibia, tarsal segments 1-5 with relative length of 15:15:10:8:8; hind leg with femur 4.1 times as long as broad, tibia 1.05 times as long as femur, ventrally with two equally long apical spurs, the spurs 0.5 times as long as basitarsus, tarsus 0.77 times as long as tibia, tarsal segments 1-5 with relative length of 25:25:15:12:15.
Wing. Fore wing nearly reaching the apex of gaster, disc with dense setae; submarginal vein twice as long as marginal vein, marginal vein 1.8 times as long as postmarginal vein and 3.6 times as long as stigmal vein, R vein and Cu vein faint but visible (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 c). Hind wing about 0.7 times as long as fore wing.
Metasoma. Metasoma sessile with gaster 0.85 times as long as head plus mesosoma; gaster punctuate reticulation. Posterior margins of tergites 1, 3, 4 straight, of tergite 2 concave, of tergite 5, 6 convex; 1st tergite with V-like basal cavity occupying 0.33 times tergite median length, 1.33 times as long as 2nd tergite and 1.23 times as long as 3rd tergite; 4th tergite 1.2 times as long as 5th tergite (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 d).
Female. (Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ) The female has been re-described in several previous studies ( Matsumura 1912, Cameron 1909, Girault 1927, Yang 1991, Huang and Xiao 2005, Sureshan 2005).
Distribution
China [Henan (new record), Shaanxi ( Yang 1991), Anhui ( Gibson 2003), Beijing ( Huang and Xiao 2005), Jiangsu ( Gibson 2003), Liaoning ( Huang and Xiao 2005), Shandong ( Gibson 2003), Taiwan ( Matsumura 1912)]; India; Indonesia; Japan; Malaysia; Philippines; Sri Lanka; Singapore; Thailand (Noyes 2019).
Biology
Hosts. Buprestidae : Chrysobothris succedanea Saunders ( Yang 1991); Cerambycidae : Clytocera chinospila Gahan, Olenecamptus bilobus (Fabricius) ( Sureshan et al. 2013), Trichoferus campestris Faldermann ( Yang 1991).
Taxon discussion
History. Walker (1846) described only the female of Epistenia ania , stating that the body colour is “purple” and providing no figures. Matsumura (1912) described the female of Thecasoma longicauda from Taiwan Province, with a habitus figure. Cameron (1909) described the female of Taoga rufipes , stating a body length of only 14 mm. Girault (1927) described only the female of Thaumasurelloides silvae . Boućek et al. (1979) designated lectotypes and synonymised S. telescopica, T. longicauda , T. rufipes with S. ania . Yang (1991) first reported the species in China mainland and re-described the female. Huang and Xiao (2005) re-described the female, stated the male colour and length and reported one male and one female from Liaoning Province, as well as one female from Beijing City; they illustrated the habitus, head, antenna and metasoma of the female individual. Gibson (2003) reported new distributional records in China, provided a key to the species of the genus and synonymised T. silvae. Sureshan (2005) reported new hosts and new distributional records in India, re-described the female and illustrated differences between S. ania and S. feretrius . Sureshan et al. (2013) reported new distributional records in India, with 10 males and 20 females parasitising Clytocera chionospila , with field photos of the female and larva.
Notes
The sexual dimorphism of this genus, which is representative and extreme in this family or even in Chalcidoidea , is seldom mentioned prior to this study: (1) the male is green (the female is blue); (2) the male body size is much smaller (the female can exceed 28 mm); (3) the male scape is half as long as head median length (female scape is as long as head median length (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 d); (4) 4th -7th tergites of male not elongate (4th -7th tergites of female distinctly elongate); (5) pronotal collar of male slightly longer than in female.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |