Eperua purpurea Bentham (1870: 226)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.542.2.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6418309 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7830D344-FF9F-FF6B-B5E6-3CFC224201CD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eperua purpurea Bentham (1870: 226) |
status |
|
Eperua purpurea Bentham (1870: 226) View in CoL
Lectotype (designated by Cowan 1975): — BRAZIL. Amazonas : Panuré , Rio Negro, Uaupés, September 1852, R. Spruce 2577 (K[000555096] image!; isolectotype P-flower[00835940] image!).
Residual syntypes: — BRAZIL. Amazonas: Panuré, Rio Negro, Uaupés, October 1852 – January 1853, R. Spruce 2577 (BM[000952280] image!, BR[0000005172238] image!, F[0057805] image!, G[00365214] image!, G[00365213] image!, GH[00339219] image!, K[000555097] image!, LE[00002233] image!, M?, NY[00004385] image!, P[00835939] image!, W[18890110503] image!, W[18890146287] image!), February 1853, R. Spruce 2577 (K[000555095] image!, P-fruit[00835940] image!), s.d., R. Spruce 2577 (RB[00539608]!).
Spruce 2577, which is the type collection of E. purpurea cited by Bentham (1870), combine collections made in three different dates: September 1852, October 1852 – January 1853, and February 1853. However, to comprise a single gathering, the specimens need to be collected on the same date ( Turland et al. 2018) and, thus, Spruce 2577 must be considered different collections. As Bentham (1870) did not specify the collection date, the exsiccate K000555096 with a handwritten annotation by Spruce is not the holotype as informed by Cowan (1975), and we correct here Cowan’s use of holotype to lectotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |