Ibizella asilahica, Haitlinger & Šundić, 2018
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4004221 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4324077 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/793C4F42-FFC7-FFE1-FF77-FDA8588CFE82 |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Ibizella asilahica |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Ibizella asilahica nov. sp.
M a t e r i a l e x a m i n e d: 1♂, 1 protonymph. Locus typicus: Asilah, 9 September 1999, Morocco, from undetermined Tenebrionidae View in CoL View at ENA . Both specimens are deposited as holo- and paratype respectively [ Aescht ] at the Museum of Natural History , Wrocław University , Poland.
D i a g n o s i s: Propodosomal plate narrow and short, setae ve absent, sejugal suture absent, c 2 <70, tarsi I-IV (without pretarsi)> 30, SS 24, setae cG I-II and mG I-II very short <30.
D e s c r i p t i o n (♂): Male (based on holotype) – Idiosoma without ornamentation with narrow propodosomal plate and setae vi. Propodosoma with very long setae se and short setae si and sl. Sejugal suture absent. Hysterosoma with 6 pairs of setae; setae c 2, d 2 and e 2 distinctly longer than setae c 1, d 1 and e 1 ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1-2 ).. Ventral side of idiosoma with very long setae h 1, h 2, cp, distinctly shorter setae h, c 3 and f 2 and short setae 1a, 3a, 4a, 4b, g, p 1, p 2 and p 3. Bases of setae h 1, h 2 and h 3 placed near posterior margin of idiosoma. Penis short. The adanal suckers well developed ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1-2 ). Gnathosoma not covered by idiosoma. Leg I-IV short. Setea cG and mG on Ge I and Ge II short, setae cG I and II only little longer than setae mG I and mG II ( Figs 3-6 View Figs 3-6 ). Measurements are given in Table 1 View Table 1 .
Females unknown.
Protonymph: Dorsal side of idiosoma with long setae se and three pairs of short setae vi, sl and si on propodosoma. Propodosomal plate invisible. Sejugal suture absent. Idiosoma without ornamentation. Hysterosoma with 6 pairs of setae; setae c 1, d 1 are short, setae c 2, d 2, e 1 and e 2 are distinctly longer ( Fig. 7 View Figs 7-8 ). Ventral side of idiosoma with long setae cp, h 1 and h 2, shorter setae f 2 and h 3 and distinctly shorter setae 1a, 3a, 4a, g, p 1, p 2 and p 3 ( Fig. 8 View Figs 7-8 ).Tarsi I-IV and legs I-IV short ( Figs 9-12 View Figs 9-12 ).
E t y m o l o g y: The species is named after the type locality [Aescht].
R e m a r k s: Ibizella asilahica differs from I. balearica (males) in the shorter GL (49 vs. 85), GW (33 vs. 48), c2 (57 vs. 76), si (17 vs. 42), c 3 (29 vs. 55), Ge I cG (21 vs. 67), Ge I mG (16 vs. 39), Ge II cG (16 vs. 42), Ge II mG (13 vs. 35), SS (24 vs. 37), longer h 1 (259 vs. 201), h 2 (209 vs. 174), h 3 (102 vs. 60), Ta I (36 vs. 21), Ta II (36 vs. 20), Ta III (36 vs. 17), Ta IV (45 vs. 24) and Ge I σ (41 vs. 22); protonymphs – in the longer c 2 (82 vs. 47-49), d 2 (92 vs. 35-38), e 1 (56 vs. 32-34), e 2 (69 vs. 25), h 1 (222 vs. 143-146), h 2 (224 vs. 103-114), h 3 (62 vs. 38-43), Ta I (28 vs. 17-18), Ta II (25 vs. 15), Ta III (30 vs. 15-17), Ta IV (39 vs. 17-19), Ge I σ (33 vs. 18-19), shorter Ge I cG (24 vs. 39-48), Ge I mG (16 vs. 26-31), Ge II cG (15 vs. 38) and Ge II mG (17 vs. 25-31); from I. samsinaki (males) in shorter PPW (20 vs. 75), c 1 (17 vs. 72), c 2 (57 vs. 105), vi (36 vs. 85), SS (24 vs. 55-63), SW (14 vs. 27-30), Ti I φ (72 vs. 103), Ti II φ (55 vs. 101), Ti III φ (49 vs. 87), Ti IV φ (53 vs. 98), IL (292 vs. 412-504) and IW (202 vs. 340-365).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.