Theodoxus pallidus (Dunker, 1861)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48312 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F2C8585A-1268-4436-9334-8B64AE20F6EE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B49BFDA-639A-5FF9-8A7B-6BC079652A67 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Theodoxus pallidus (Dunker, 1861) |
status |
|
Theodoxus pallidus (Dunker, 1861) Figure 20A-Y View Figure 20
Neritina pallida Dunker 1861: 40; Martens 1879: 239, pl. 23, figs 11, 12; Kobelt 1899: 13, pl. 214, fig. 1349.
Theodoxus Doriae Issel 1865: 23-24; Issel 1866: 407-408; Biggs 1937: 349; Mansoorian and Samaee 2012: 55-56 (partim, only material from Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Isfahan, and Yazd provinces).
Neritina Doriae : Martens 1879: 222-223, pl. 21, figs 22, 23; Kobelt 1899: 7-8, pl. 212, fig. 1335.
Theodoxus doriae var. obscura Biggs 1937: 349.
Theodoxus pallidus : Starmühlner and Edlauer 1957: 437-442, text figs 1-5, fig. 1a (synonymy tentative); Roth 1987: 75; Sands et al. 2019b: 3, fig. 1.
? Theodoxus (Theodoxus) doriae : Schütt and Şeşen 1989b: 41.
? Theodoxus euphraticus : Mansoorian and Samaee 2012: 56-59 (partim, only material from Kerman and Yazd provinces; non Neritina euphratica Mousson, 1874 [= T. jordani ])
Theodoxus fluviatilis : Glöer and Pešić 2012: 16-17 (partim, only Fars and Hormozgan material; non Nerita fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758).
Theodoxus pallida [sic]: Glöer and Pešić 2012: 17-18, fig. 3a-c.
Type locality.
Southern Persia (= Iran).
Type material.
Two syntypes of N. pallida are deposited in ZMB (coll. no. ZMB /Moll 108792-108793) . Nine syntypes of N. doriae are stored in MSNG (without coll. no.) . The holotype of T. doriae var. obscura from Aqda, Iran, is stored in BMNH (coll. no. 1958.6.13.22) .
Remarks.
Theodoxus pallidus was described by Dunker (1861) from southern Persia (present-day Iran). Starmühlner and Edlauer (1957) synonymised T. pallidus and T. doriae based on similarities among the material and distinguished this species from T. fluviatilis by a higher spire (Figs 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 , 20 View Figure 20 ). Glöer and Pešić (2012) recently reviewed the material of T. pallidus from Starmühlner and Edlauer (1957) and corroborated the differentiation from T. fluviatilis and provided more differentiating features based on the operculum. However, Glöer and Pešić (2012) differed in the synonymy of T. doriae , which they synonymised with T. fluviatilis . Molecular data of material from southern Iran conforming to Dunker’s (1861) description of T. pallidus and material of T. doriae from Kerman province support the independence of T. pallidus from T. fluviatilis , as well as the synonymy of T. pallidus and T. doriae as suggested by Starmühlner and Edlauer (1957) ( Sands et al. 2019b). In turn, T. pallidus shares a close sister-species relationship with T. major ( Sands et al. 2019b; Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). The pronouncement of the spire seems to vary among populations in T. pallidus and the shell shape may largely mimic those seen in T. major (except T. schultzii -morphotype). However, this species seems to be dominated by black morphs or specimens with thicker dark banding, and the conchioline lamella is much more reduced in comparison to the sister species (Figs 19 View Figure 19 , 20 View Figure 20 ).
Theodoxus doriae var. obscura Biggs, 1937 ranges within the variability shown by the syntype series of T. doriae (Fig. 20Q-Y View Figure 20 ) concerning shell shape and colouration and is consequently considered a junior synonym of T. pallidus .
Distribution.
All records of T. pallidus are restricted to south-central Persia and occur from the Zagros Mountains eastward in at least Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Fars, Hormozgan, Isfahan, Kerman, and Yazd provinces of Iran ( Starmühlner and Edlauer 1957; Mansoorian and Samaee 2012; Sands et al. 2019b; Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ). Records of T. doriae [= T. pallidus ] from Gilan and Mazandaran provinces by Mansoorian and Samaee (2012) and North Khorasan and Razavi Khorasan provinces by Glöer and Pešić (2012) are likely misidentified T. major ( Sands et al. 2019b; Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ), and those from Anatolia ( Roth 1987) are likely misidentified T. fluviatilis ( Sands et al. 2019a).
ZMB |
Germany, Berlin, Museum fuer Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitaet |
MSNG |
Italy, Genova, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale "Giacomo Doria" |
BMNH |
United Kingdom, London, The Natural History Museum [formerly British Museum (Natural History)] |
UGSB |
UGSB |
ZMB |
Museum f�r Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections) |
MSNG |
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 'Giacomo Doria' |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Theodoxus pallidus (Dunker, 1861)
Sands, Arthur F, Gloeer, Peter, Guerlek, Mustafa E, Albrecht, Christian & Neubauer, Thomas A 2020 |
Neritina euphratica
Mousson 1874 |
Theodoxus Doriae
Issel 1865 |
Theodoxus (Theodoxus) doriae
Issel 1865 |
Neritina pallida
Dunker 1862 |
Theodoxus pallida
Dunker 1861 |
Nerita fluviatilis
Linnaeus 1758 |