Homa haematoptilus ( Kirkaldy, 1906 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5087.1.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0C614031-1F0A-4F21-AE38-8B028FB23109 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5819995 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B6587A5-D67B-705B-4FBA-54DEFB1EFCC1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Homa haematoptilus ( Kirkaldy, 1906 ) |
status |
|
Homa haematoptilus ( Kirkaldy, 1906) View in CoL
( Figs 1–4 View FIGURES 1–22 , 23–25 View FIGURES 23–37 , 38–45 View FIGURES 38–45 )
Eupteryx haematoptilus Kirkaldy, 1906: 362 View in CoL .
Homa insignis Distant, 1908: 400 View in CoL , synonymized by Dworakowska, 1969.
Cicadella haematoptila, Metcalf, 1968: 685 View in CoL .
Homa haematoptilus, Dworakowska, 1969: 48 View in CoL .
Material examined.
Type material: state details of holotype. unavailable now (mentioned below).
Other materials: 10♂♂, Thailand Nakhon Nayok Khao Yai NP Behind Football field, 14 o 24.619'N 101 o 22.778'E, 770 m, Malaise trap, July 5–12, 2006, Pong Sandao, leg. T 142 ( INHS, QSBG); 1♂, China, Yunnan, Jinghong City, Wild Elephant Valley, April 29–May 4, 2017, Ye Xu ( NWAFU).
Description.
Measurements. Body length: male 3.9–4.1 mm.
Ground color red. Forewing with red transverse brand broad, apical 1/3 transparent.
1T apodemes forming almost right triangle, not extended to segment II ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–37 ). Male pygofer in profile with apex slightly protruded, bearing 8–10 rigid microsetae along posterior margin, dorsal bridge well developed, occupying 4/5 length of pygofer in dorsal aspect ( Figs 24, 25 View FIGURES 23–37 , 38–40 View FIGURES 38–45 ). Subgenital plate in lateral view gradually curved dorsad apically; basal setae (7–8) situated on broadest section of plate, one or two setae separated from bristle clusters; marginal setae (10–11) arranged in a single row; macrosetae (5) discrete, not extended to tip of plate; feeble microsetae (11–12) inconspicuous, slightly longer than marginal setae ( Figs 24 View FIGURES 23–37 , 38, 41 View FIGURES 38–45 ). Aedeagus shaft in lateral view tapered distally, with stiff, peg-like process directed basad, gonopore subapical on ventral side ( Figs 42, 43 View FIGURES 38–45 ). Style broad at base, dentifer distinctly narrower than basal section, with 6–7 tiny teeth and 3–4 short setae ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 38–45 ). Anal tube process short, tapered ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 38–45 ).
Remarks. Homa haematoptilus was described based on a specimen collected from Queensland by Kirkaldy (1906), and it was originally placed in Eupteryx Curtis, 1829 . However, Dworakowska (1969) transferred Eupteryx haematoptilus Kirkaldy, 1906 to Homa and synonymized H. insignis Distant, 1908 after studying the Homa specimens deposited in the British Museum, creating a new combination: H. haematoptilus ( Kirkaldy, 1906) . Unfortunately, the genitalia of H. insignis Distant is missing now. Mahmood (1967) redescribed Homa insignis Distant, 1908 based on specimens of the male type deposited at the Natural History Museum, London, and illustrated the male genitalia for the first time. The specimens illustrated here were identified based on drawings (Plate 10: 2c, 2e) provided by Mahmood.
Distribution. Ceylon, Australia (Queensland), Philippines, Thailand and China (Yunnan).
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
INHS |
Illinois Natural History Survey |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Homa haematoptilus ( Kirkaldy, 1906 )
Xu, Ye, Wang, Yi-Mei, Dmitriev, Dmitry A., Dietrich, Christopher H. & Qin, Dao-Zheng 2022 |
Homa haematoptilus
Dworakowska, I. 1969: 48 |
Cicadella haematoptila
Metcalf, Z. P. 1968: 685 |
Homa insignis
Distant, W. L. 1908: 400 |
Eupteryx haematoptilus
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1906: 362 |