Diochus antennatus ( Motschulsky, 1858 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4127.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E858916-3F3A-4D87-B987-B62CE241CED0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6063253 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C5887A3-FFF3-B249-FF6A-F9A43678FF00 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Diochus antennatus ( Motschulsky, 1858 ) |
status |
|
5. Diochus antennatus ( Motschulsky, 1858) View in CoL
( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 )
Motschulsky, 1858: 659 ( Rhegmatocerus ; Type locality: Indes orientales); Bernhauer and Schubert, 1914: 319 (catalog); Bernhauer, 1922: 231 ( Formosa); Cameron, 1932: 46 (Penang; Malay Peninsula); Shibata, 1973: 130 ( Taiwan); Coiffait, 1982: 27 ( Nepal); Herman, 2001: 2444 (catalog); Smetana, 2004: 624 ( Taiwan; Nepal); Löbl & Löbl, 2015: 1007 (Palaearctic catalog; Australian Region).
Syn.: Diochus indicus Kraatz, 1859: 113 (Type locality: India orientalis); Bernhauer and Schubert, 1914: 319 (synonym of D. antennatus ); Cameron, 1931: 360 (New Guinea); Cameron, 1932: 46 (synonym of D. antennatus ); Smetana, 2004: 624 (synonym of D. antennatus ); Löbl & Löbl, 2015: 1007 (Palaearctic catalog; synonym of D. antennatus ).
Material examined: None.
Distribution. China ( Taiwan); “East Indies”, Nepal, Malaysia, Indonesia, New Guinea. Remarks. The syntypes are missing (per. comm. with Dr. Arnaldo Bordoni, Dr. Jiri Janak, and Dr. Aleksey Gusakov). However, the characters of the aedeagus and male genital segments ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 , cf. Jiri’s drafted drawing on a male syntype) could be easily recognized as different from congeneric species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |