Metarhizium macrosemiae M.J. Chen & B. Huang, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.575.1.4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7409572 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D48879C-111F-5268-F9F2-FF35C8FBAB16 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Metarhizium macrosemiae M.J. Chen & B. Huang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Metarhizium macrosemiae M.J. Chen & B. Huang View in CoL , sp. nov. Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 .
MycoBank MB 845475
Etymology:— The epithet refers to its original host, an adult of cicada ( Macrosemia ).
Typification:— CHINA. Anhui Province: Guniujiang Nature Preserve, 29º59ˊ– 30º6ˊN, 117º15′– 117º34ˊE, on adult of Macrosemia ( Hemiptera : Cicadidae ) attached to upper side of dicot. leaf in forest, 12 Aug 2020, Y. Lin, T. Wang & M.J. Chen (holotype no. GNJ20200812 -01; ex-type culture no. RCEF 6696, isolated from conidia. Preserved in Research Center for Entomogenous Fungi (RCEF)). GenBank (RCEF6696): ITS = MW718317 View Materials , SSU = MW718233 View Materials ; LSU = MW718259 View Materials ; TEF = MW723113 View Materials ; RPB1 = 723144; RPB2 = 723164 GoogleMaps .
Known distribution:— Guniujiang Nature Preserve, Anhui, China.
Description:— Specimens found on adult cicada ( Hemiptera : Cicadidae ). The head and internodal membrane of the host insect were covered with white to pale or light green mycelium and powdery cream to green sporulating conidiophores. Synnemata absent. Conidiophores mononematous. Conidia smooth-walled, dimorphic, in chains and adhering laterally to form columns ; microconidia ovoid, ellipsoidal, 4.3–5.2 × 2.4–3.0 μm; macroconidia cylindrical, 12.0–16.0 × 3.4– 4.0 μm ( Fig. 2 A, B View FIGURE 2 ).
Culture characteristics:— Colonies on SDAY/4 reaching 59–62 mm in diam. after 14 d at 25 °C, plane, velutinous to flocculent, farinose when sporulating; light green. Sporulation starts at 7 d after inoculation, reverse pale brown, causing a brown concentric ring outside of the inoculum. Mycelium white, composed of branched, septate, smoothwalled, hyaline hyphae, 2.7–3.3 μm wide. Conidiophores arising from hyphae, smooth-walled. Phialides solitary or in a group of two to three borne directly on metulae, smooth-walled, cylindrical, 5.0–6.5(–8) × 2.4–3.0 μm. Conidia smooth-walled, dimorphic; microconidia formed first, ovoid, ellipsoidal, 3.7–5.0 × 2.1–3.2 μm; macroconidia formed later, cylindrical, (6–)9.5–14.0(–16) × 2.7–3.3 μm.
Colonies on PDA attaining a diam. of 57–60 mm in 14 d, floccose, cream to dark green with age. Sporulation starts at 7 d after inoculation, reverse slightly greenish in outmost. Mycelium white, composed of branched, septate, smoothwalled, hyaline hyphae, 2.4–3.4 μm wide. Conidiophores arising from hyphae, smooth-walled. Phialides solitary or in a group of two to three borne directly on metulae, smooth-walled, cylindrical, 5.0–6.0 × 2.4–3.1 μm. Conidia smoothwalled, dimorphic; microconidia formed first, ovoid, ellipsoidal, 4.1–5.0 × 2.4–2.7 μm; macroconidia formed later, cylindrical, (10–)12.5–18.5 × 2.5–3.5(–4) μm.
Colonies on OA attaining a diam. of 73–76 mm in 14 d, mycelium floccose, cottony, cream to green, powdery while sporulating. Sporulation starts at 7 d after inoculation. Mycelium white, composed of branched, septate, smoothwalled, hyaline hyphae, 2.2–3.0 μm wide. Conidiophores arising from hyphae, smooth-walled. Phialides solitary or in a group of two to three borne directly on metulae, smooth-walled, cylindrical, 5.0–6.0 × 2.4–3.0 μm. Conidia smoothwalled, dimorphic; microconidia formed first, ovoid, ellipsoidal, 3.8–5.0 ×2.2–3.0 μm; macroconidia formed later, cylindrical, (11–)13.0–17.0 × 2.5–3.0 μm.
Additional specimen examined:— CHINA. Anhui Province: Shitai county, Guniujiang Nature Preserve , on adult cicada, Macrosemia sp. , 12 Aug 2020, Y. Lin, T. Wang & M.J. Chen ( GNJ20200812-01 , RCEF 6696 ) .
Notes: — Metarhizium cicadae , M. chaiyaphumense and M. takense are morphologically close to this species. However, M. macrosemiae and M. cicadae parasitize adult cicadas while M. chaiyaphumense and M. takense infect cicada nymphs. In M. macrosemiae the phialides and conidia on OA and PDA are smaller than in M. cicadae . Furthermore, M. macrosemiae is distinguished from M. chaiyaphumense by its host, growth rate on SDAY/4 and PDA, and size of the phialides, while it differs significantly from M. takense in colony colour, growth rate on SDAY/4 and PDA, and the presence of macroconidia ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ).
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |