Schendylops oligopus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S0031-10492013001300001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E7CED52-FFD4-522F-FC8E-5D51FD90D370 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Schendylops oligopus |
status |
|
Schendylops oligopus
( Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995)
( Figs. 61-81 View FIGURES 61‑66 View FIGURES 67‑76 View FIGURES 77‑81 )
Schendylurus oligopus Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995: 325 , 345-347.
Schendylurus oligopus : Adis, Minelli, de Morais, Pereira, Barbieri & Rodrigues, 1996: 168, 169; Pereira, Ituarte & Tassara, 2004: 5; Foddai & Minelli, 1999: 277.
Schendylops oligopus View in CoL : Hoffman & Pereira 1997: 21; Morrone & Pereira 1999: 167, 170; Minelli, Foddai, Pereira & Lewis 2000: 104; Foddai, Pereira & Minelli, 2000: 142, 182; Pereira, Foddai & Minelli, 2002: 59; Foddai, Minelli & Pereira, 2002: 459, 463, 473; Adis, Foddai, Golovatch, Hoffman, Minelli, de Morais, Pereira, Scheller, Schileyco & Würmli, 2002: 18; Foddai, Bonato, Pereira & Minelli, 2003: 1263; Foddai, Pereira & Minelli, 2004: 272, 279; Bonato & Minelli, 2008: 253; Pereira, 2009: 186, 205; 2011: 321.
Diagnosis: A Neotropical species of Schendylops without pore-field on sternite of the first leg-bearing segment; pore-fields present on anterior region of the body only; all pore-fields undivided; a.a. IV similar in length to the contiguous a.a.; medial edge of forcipular trochanteroprefemur unarmed.
Among the Neotropical species of the genus sharing these five combined traits, S. oligopus is morphologically very similar to S. ramirezi sp. nov. with which it shares the lowest segment numbers in the genus Schendylops , and a very small body size. S. oligopus can be differentiated from S. ramirezi by means of the following selected traits (those for the latter are given in parentheses): male with 27 or 29 leg-bearing segments, female with 31 (male with 27 leg-bearing segments, female with 29); body length up to 10 mm (body length up to 7 mm); clypeus with an anterior middle area with areolation smaller than the remaining clypeal surface, Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61‑66 (clypeus without a clypeal area, Fig. 47 View FIGURES 46‑55 ); coxosternite of first maxillae devoid of setae, Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61‑66 (coxosternite of first maxillae with 1+1 setae, Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46‑55 ); coxosternite of second maxillae without a seta on the middle, Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61‑66 (coxosternite of second maxillae bearing a large seta on the middle, Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46‑55 : a); single pore-fields not accompanied at the anterior sides by additional pores, Figs. 67-73 View FIGURES 67‑76 (single pore-fields accompanied at the anterior sides by a few additional pores, Figs. 28-41 View FIGURES 27‑35 View FIGURES 36‑41 ); pretarsus of ultimate legs as a very small tubercle with two apical spines, Fig. 75 View FIGURES 67‑76 (pretarsus of ultimate legs as a very small tubercle with a single apical spine, Figs. 44, 45 View FIGURES 42‑45 ).
Other morphological traits included in Table 1 differentiate S. oligopus from S. ramirezi .
New material examined: Brazil: Amazonas: 02°30’S, 60°10’W (terra firme, campinarana, primary white-sand forest), 17 August 1988, J. Adis et al., leg.: 2 males (with tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa), 29 l. -b.s., b.l. 8 mm; 1 juvenile female (with 2+2 coxal organs), 31 l. -b.s., b.l., 5 mm (specimen “A”) ( MLP) GoogleMaps . Brazil: Amazonas: 02°34’S, 60°06W, capoeira, burned secondary upland forest, 06 October 1990, M.O. de A. Ribeiro leg.: 1 female with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa and with mature ova, 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 8 mm; 1 male with tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa, 29 l. -b.s., b.l. 7.5 mm ( MLP) GoogleMaps . Same locality and collector, 09 October 1990: 4 males with tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa, 29 l. -b.s., b.l. 7.5 mm (specimen “A”), 7.5, 8, and 8 mm; 3 females with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa and with mature ova, 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 8, 9 and 9 mm; 1 female with mature ova 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 7 mm; 1 female with the two spermathecae full of spermatozoa, 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 10 mm; 1 female subadult, 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 7 mm; 1 female juvenile, 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 6 mm; 4 juvenile females with 1+1 coxal organs only, 31 l. -b.s., b.l. 4, 4, 4 and 4 mm; 1 male juvenile with 1+1 coxal organs only, 29 l. -b.s., b.l. 4 mm ( MLP) . Same locality and collector, 03 January 1991: 1 male (with tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa), 29 l. -b.s., b.l., 8 mm ( MLP) .
Remarks: The localities of 02°30’S, 60°10’W (terra firme, campinarana white-sand forest), and 02°34’S, 60°06W, capoeira, burned secondary upland forest (both in Brazil: Amazonas State), are new for the geographic distribution of S. oligopus .
The following additional morphological information can be given based on the female holotype (described by Pereira et al., 1995), and the new specimens hereby examined.
Female holotype: length of Cephalic plate: ca. 0.30 mm; width of forcipular coxosternite ca. 0.28 mm. Antennae: ratio of width of a.a. II /width of a.a. XIV, ca. 1.07: 1; ratio of length/width of a.a. XIV ca. 1.63: 1. Ultimate leg-bearing segment: ratio of length/width of sternite ca. 0.78: 1; ratio of length/width of tergite ca. 0.74: 1. Ultimate legs: ratio of length of telopodites/length of sternite ca. 3.72: 1; ratio of width of tibia/width of tarsus I ca. 1.33: 1; tarsus II longer than tarsus I in the proportion ca. 1.34: 1.
Male (Specimen “A” cited above): Ultimate leg-bearing segment: ratio of length/width of sternite ca. 0.68: 1; ratio of length/width of tergite ca. 0.65: 1. Ultimate legs: ratio of length of telopodites/length of sternite ca. 3.14: 1; ratio of width of tibia/width of tarsus I ca. 1.33: 1; tarsus II longer than tarsus I in the proportion ca. 1.34: 1.
Postpedal segments: with shape as in Fig. 80 View FIGURES 77‑81 . Penis dorsally with 1+1 apical setae ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 77‑81 ).
Post embryonic variation of coxal organs: the female juvenile individualized above as “Specimen A” has the anterior coxal organs incompletely developed, being much smaller than the posterior organs ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 77‑81 : a). (Shape of coxal organs in adult specimens as shown in Fig. 76 View FIGURES 67‑76 ).
Variation: females with 31 leg-bearing segments, males with 27 or 29 leg-bearing segments. Penis with 0+1 or 1+1 apical setae.
The maximum body length recorded up to the present was 9.5 mm for the females and 7 mm for the males; from the new material cited above, it is now 10 mm and 8 mm respectively.
Type locality: Brazil: Amazonas: Reserva Florestal A. Ducke.
Known range: Brazil: Amazonas: Reserva Florestal A. Ducke (02°55’S, 59°59’W); Distrito Agropecuario Rio Suframa (J) (03°34S, 60°60’W) GoogleMaps ; 02°30’S, 60°10’W (terra firme, campinarana white-sand forest) GoogleMaps ; 02°34’S, 60°06W, capoeira, burned secondary upland forest.
MLP |
Museo de La Plata |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Schendylops oligopus
Pereira, Luis Alberto 2013 |
Schendylops oligopus
PEREIRA, L. A. 2009: 186 |
BONATO, L. & MINELLI, A. 2008: 253 |
FODDAI, D. & PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. 2004: 272 |
FODDAI, D. & BONATO, L. & PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. 2003: 1263 |
PEREIRA, L. A. & FODDAI, D. & MINELLI, A. 2002: 59 |
PEREIRA, L. A. & FODDAI, D. & MINELLI, A. 2002: 459 |
ADIS, J. & FODDAI, D. & GOLOVATCH, S. I. & HOFFMAN, R. L. & MINELLI, A. & DE MORAIS, J. W. & PEREIRA, L. A. & SCHELLER, U. & SCHILEYCO, A. A. & WURMLI, M. 2002: 18 |
MINELLI, A. & FODDAI, D. & PEREIRA, L. A. & LEWIS, J. G. E. 2000: 104 |
MINELLI, A. & FODDAI, D. & PEREIRA, L. A. & LEWIS, J. G. E. 2000: 142 |
MORRONE, J. J. & PEREIRA, L. A. 1999: 167 |
HOFFMAN, R. L. & PEREIRA, L. A. 1997: 21 |
Schendylurus oligopus
PEREIRA, L. A. & ITUARTE, C. & TASSARA, M. P. 2004: 5 |
FODDAI, D. & MINELLI, A. 1999: 277 |
ADIS, J. & MINELLI, A. & DE MORAIS, J. W. & PEREIRA, L. A. & BARBIERI, F. & RODRIGUES, J. M. G. 1996: 168 |
Schendylurus oligopus
PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. & BARBIERI, F. 1995: 325 |