Centropomus irae, Carvalho-Filho & Oliveira & Soares & Araripe, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4671.1.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5610930 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F3087D9-A82C-FF83-A2C3-EB0931CBFCF5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Centropomus irae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Centropomus irae sp. nov. Carvalho-Filho, Oliveira, Soares & Araripe
( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ; Tables 1–2 View TABLE 1 View TABLE 2 )
Holotype. MPEG 30613, 326.3 mm SL. Brazil, Amapá, Oiapoque, Baía do Oiapoque (Lat. 3.84 /Long. -51.82), A. Costa and J. Oliveira, 23 February 2014.
Paratypes. (9 specimens). MPEG 30614 View Materials , 05 View Materials , 233.4–409.1 mm SL ; MZUSP 115987 View Materials , 02 View Materials , 312.2–360.2 mm SL ; MNRJ 42279, 353.4 mm SL; and ZUEC 8465, 346.3 mm SL, all collected together with the holotype .
Non-type specimens. (13 specimens). Excluded from the type material because of damage. MPEG 30615 View Materials , 13 View Materials , 272.4 View Materials – 318.2 mm SL, same data as for holotype .
Diagnosis. The new species differs from all its congeners by the typically brown-colored lateral line, mean interorbital width (4.1% of SL vs. 5.2–6.9%), mean snout length (8.9% of SL vs. 9.8–11.1%), mean orbit diameter (4.5% of SL vs. 5.4–7.3%), and mean mandible length (15.7% of SL vs. 19.9–21.6%). It can also be differentiated from the similar Centropomus undecimalis by the number of scales around the caudal peduncle (18–22, usually 19–21, vs. 22–28, usually 24–27).
Description. Meristic and morphometric data are presented in Tables 1 View TABLE 1 and 2 View TABLE 2 . Body elongate, sub-cylindrical in cross section, deeper at first dorsal fin origin. Head large, about one third of SL (33–36%, mean 33.5%). Dorsal profile of head slightly concave from snout to nape, gently curved from nape to origin of first dorsal fin. Mouth relatively large, maxillary almost reaching posterior margin of orbit. Mandible short, mean 15.7% SL. Orbit diameter relatively small, around half of snout length, mean 4.5% SL. Interorbital width narrow, mean 4.1% SL. Snout length small, mean 8.9% SL. Preorbital faintly serrated. Opercular flap extending to 6th or 7th pored lateral line scale and about 4 dorsal scales before origin of first dorsal fin. Margin of preoperculum almost entirely serrated, with 4 to 6 enlarged spines at angle. Upper limb of preoperculum with upper serrae dorsally-oriented, other serrae straight; lower limb of preoperculum never smooth, with two short, obtuse, closely located spines near angle, and usually with pointed serrae, which may include some short obtuse spines. Distal margins of interoperculum and suboperculum smooth. Center of external preopercular shelf with 0–2 spines, one conspicuous, sharp, usually present in angle, often with one markedly shorter spine ventrally. No tooth patch on ectoperygoid. Band of laterally exposed premaxillary teeth not extending to dorsal margin of the bone, gradually tapering to point posteriorly. Gill rakers on first branchial arch 12–15 without rudiments, 8–10 on lower limb (one specimen with 10), 4 or 5 on upper limb (one specimen with 5); total gill rakers 18–22 with rudiments; gill rakers long, those at center of first arch at least twice as long as gill filaments.
Pectoral fin as long as, but usually shorter than pelvic fin, and far from reaching its tip; pelvic fin not reaching anus. Third dorsal-fin spine longer than fourth. Second anal-fin spine not extending beyond middle of caudal peduncle, its length similar to third anal-fin spine. Lateral line scales 67–74; lateral scale rows 72–80; scales on caudal peduncle 18–23, usually 19–21 (one specimen with 23); scales from origin of second dorsal fin to lateral line 9–11; scales from origin of anal fin to lateral line 10–12 (one specimen with 10). For further comparisons with other congener species, see Discussion
Color of live specimens. Upper head and dorsum brown to tan, often with bluish hue; sides silvery gray to golden with faint longitudinal lines darker due to the dark center of scale rows, more evident in the upper-posterior body and close to lateral line. Lateral line usually brown in riverine and estuarine specimens, darker in sea-caught specimens which also lack golden hue on sides, being more silvery gray in general coloration. Operculum pearl with irregular, variable, golden area, more conspicuous close to posterior border of eye. Dorsal fins-rays and/or spines sometimes suffused with dark gray; first dorsal fin spines brownish to light tan, membrane pearly gray to translucid golden; second dorsal fin spine and rays brownish to light tan, membrane translucid golden; upper lobe of caudal fin tan to yellowish, lower lobe darker, often suffused with black; anal fin tan, golden or yellowish, sometimes suffused with black; pelvic fin tan to light yellow, suffused with golden hue; pectoral fin colorless to light yellow, often suffused with golden hue.
Color of preserved specimen. brownish and golden colors disappear, resulting in a gray or silvery-gray coloration, respectively; lateral line brownish-gray. Fins pale with faint traces of yellow, portions suffused with black more evident.
Etymology. The new species is named after Dr. Iracilda Sampaio (Federal University of Pará, Bragança, Pará, Brazil) in recognition of her lifelong contribution to the understanding of the genetic diversity of the fauna of the Amazon region, in particular fish, and her profound dedication to science and teaching. Proposed English name: Ira’s Snook. Proposed Portuguese (Brazilian) name: Camorim Irá.
Distribution and habitat. Centropomus irae sp. nov. is currently known only from the specimens presented here, which were collected in Oiapoque Bay, between Brazil and French Guyana, and the Lago Piratuba Biological Reserve, both in Amapá state, Brazil, northeastern South America. In the case of the large Piratuba lagoon ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), Centropomus irae sp. nov. was observed in the more saline waters, close to the outlet channel of the lagoon to the sea, as confirmed by local fishermen, and also in the center of the lagoon. Unfortunately none of the specimens collected from the lagoon could be preserved, and were lost, but we were able to take a picture of the largest individual (535.5 mm SL, Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ), and to take measurements and counts of two large specimens from this locality (see Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).
Character | Holotype | Paratypes | Non-type | Lago Piratuba | Proportions | Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Specimens | (9) | (13) | (2) | Mode | (25) | |
(25) | ||||||
Standard Length (mm) | 326.1 | 233.3–353.5 | 272.4–318.2 | 497.3–535.0 | 352.9 | 233.3–535.0 |
Body depth | 24.5 | 22.1–24.3 | 19.0–25.2 | 22.4–22.6 | 22.6 | 19.0–25.2 |
Head length | 36.2 | 33.6–35.7 | 33.3–36.3 | 33.2–33.3 | 34.8 | 33.3–36.3 |
Snout length | 8.9 | 8.5–9.7 | 8.3–9.3 | 8.2–8.5 | 8.9 | 8.3–9.7 |
Orbit diameter | 4.5 | 3.8–4.7 | 4.2–5.3 | 3.7–3.9 | 4.5 | 3.8 – 5.3 |
Interorbital width | 4.4 | 3.7–4.7 | 3.9–4.4 | 3.9–4.1 | 4.1 | 3.7–4.7 |
Postorbital length | 22.2 | 21.0–22.1 | 19.6–22.5 | 20.9–21.6 | 21.3 | 19.6–22.5 |
Maxillary length | 13.9 | 13.3–14.8 | 13.2–14.3 | 13.0–13.1 | 13.7 | 13.2–14.8 |
Mandible length | 16.0 | 15.0–16.5 | 15.3–16.6 | 14.9–15.0 | 15.7 | 15.0–16.6 |
First predorsal length | 42.0 | 37.3–40.9 | 38.2–42.9 | 38.9–39.0 | 40.2 | 37.3–42.9 |
Second predorsal length | 67.5 | 62.7–66.5 | 61.8–67.8 | 63.0–64.1 | 65.0 | 61.8–67.8 |
Prepelvic length | 34.6 | 31.5–40.4 | 34.2–39.4 | 35.8–36.4 | 36.3 | 31.5–40.4 |
Pectoral-fin length | 20.3 | 17.6–20.1 | 17.9–20.3 | 17.1–17.7 | 18.9 | 17.6–20.3 |
Pelvic-fin length | 22.4 | 19.0–21.1 | 19.2–24.2 | 19.2–21.2 | 20.5 | 19.0–24.2 |
First dorsal base length | 18.6 | 17.8–19.7 | 15.8–18.2 | 18.3–18.6 | 17.8 | 15.8–19.7 |
Second dorsal base length | 16.7 | 16.2–17.8 | 13.5–16.6 | 16.3–16.9 | 16.0 | 13.5–17.8 |
Anal-fin base length | 11.0 | 10.7–13.8 | 8.6–11.0 | 11.2–12.0 | 10.5 | 8.6–13.8 |
Caudal-peduncle depth | 11.0 | 8.7–13.5 | 9.8–11.7 | 9.9–9.9 | 10.6 | 8.7–13.5 |
First dorsal-fin elements | VIII-I,10 | VIII-I,10 | VIII-I,10 | VIII-I, 10 | VIII-I, 10 | |
Anal-fin elements | III,6 | III,6 | III,6 | III,6 | III,6 | |
Pectoral-fin rays | 13 | 13–15 | 14–15 | 15 | 13–15 | |
Pelvic-fin elements | I,5 | I,5 | I,5 | I,5 | I,5 | |
Lateral-line scales | 71 | 67–74 | 67–74 | 68–72 | 67–74 | |
Lateral scales rows | 76 | 72–80 | 72–80 | 72–76 | 72–80 | |
Scales above lateral line | 10 | 09–11 | 09–11 | 09–10 | 09–11 | |
Scales below lateral line | 11 | 11–12 | 11–12 | 11 | 11–12 | |
Scales around peduncle | 21 | 19–22 | 18–22 | 21-23 | 18–23 | |
Upper-limb gill rakers | 04 | 04–05 | 04–05 | 05 | 04–05 | |
Lower-limb gill rakers | 08 | 08–10 | 08–09 | 08 | 08–10 | |
Gill rakers with rudiments | 19 | 17–22 | 18–20 | 17–18 | 17–22 |
Species | C. irae | C. ensiferus | C. mexicanus | C. parallelus | C. pectina- | C. poeyi | C. undecimalis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
tus | |||||||
Character | |||||||
SL mm | 233–535 | 112–270 | 105–345 | 104–445 | 101–362 | 190–276 | 109–471 (242) |
(353) | (196) | (202) | (237) | (224) | (223) | ||
Head length | 333–363 | 371–421 | 352–386 | 347–403 | 328–374 | 364–382 | 345–389 (368) |
(348) | (395) | (370) | (377) | (351) | (372) | ||
Snout length | 83–97 (89) | 98–123 | 94–116 (106) | 103–116 | 100–114 | 93–101 | 89–112 (101) |
(111) | (110) | (108) | (98) | ||||
Orbit length | 38–53 (45) | 50–71 (57) | 59–88 (73) | 56–78 (67) | 56–77 (66) | 60–72 | 38–64 (54) |
(64) | |||||||
Interorbital | 37–47 (41) | 52–63 (57) | 49–66 (57) | 56–70 (64) | 53–66 (61) | 60–72 | 44–61 (52) |
(64) | |||||||
Mandible | 150–166 | 186–214 | 198–216 | 188–224 | 188–217 | 208–225 | 201–228 (216) |
length. | (157) | (199) | (210) | (210) | (199) | (214) | |
Anal-fin rays | III,6 | III, 6 | III, 6 | III, 6 | III,7 | III, 6 | III, 6 |
Lateral scales | 72–80 | 49–59 | 68–78 | 79–92 | 61–71 | 73–80 | 67–77 |
rows | |||||||
Total Gill | 12–15 | 14 –22 | 14–17 | 14–17 | 19–23 | 15–18 | 11 –14 |
Rakers | |||||||
Scales around | 18–23 | 18–23 | 24–28 | 26–31 | 20–22 | 24–29 | 22–28 |
peduncle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |