Melchus perplexus Anderson
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/579 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D98ABFDD-7421-4EAC-A4D0-A84AD1643B02 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5397649 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2F06E1FC-EC32-42BD-B32D-8DBB26E8D8C3 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:2F06E1FC-EC32-42BD-B32D-8DBB26E8D8C3 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Melchus perplexus Anderson |
status |
sp. nov. |
Melchus perplexus Anderson , new species
Figs. 7–8 View Figs , 14, 17 View Figs
Types. Holotype male labelled ‘‘ San Jose , Dept / La Paz Bolivia / September 1925 / GL Harrington’ ’ ( USNM).
Derivation of Species Name. The species is named because of its similarity to M. onorei and resulting initial uncertainty as to whether or not it represented a different species.
Identification. Melchus perplexus can be separated from the very similar M. onorei by the less distinctly sinuate rostrum ( Fig. 14 View Figs ) which is dorsally more shallowly and less coarsely punctate near the base with a broad median impunctate area ( Fig. 17 View Figs ).
Description. Female not known. Male, length, 8.7 mm; width 4.4 mm. Color dark reddish brown, extensively infuscate throughout, integument with scattered tufts of micropilosity or micropilose nodules, especially towards declivity of elytra.
As in M. onorei but rostrum with only slight sinuation at basal one-third; dorsally with less dense shallow punctures near base and broad median impunctate area. Antenna with club with apical pilose part one-third length entire club. Male genitalia as in M. onorei .
Distribution. Bolivia (La Paz). The type locality is given only as ‘‘San Jose.’’ This might refer to San Jose de Chupiamonas.
Natural History. There is no information available on the natural history of this species.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.