Yuelushannus alatus, Irfan & Zhou & Bashir & Mukhtar & Peng, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.642 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F88C22D-0A1D-4BBB-A858-C0199866A63A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3818632 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F99DDE92-46AE-48EE-BDAA-1CF11ECE3537 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F99DDE92-46AE-48EE-BDAA-1CF11ECE3537 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Yuelushannus alatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Yuelushannus alatus View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F99DDE92-46AE-48EE-BDAA-1CF11ECE3537
Figs 1–5 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , 11 View Fig
Etymology
The species name comes from Latin adjective “ alatus ”, meaning “winged” and refers to the ocular region with wing-like spines in the male.
Diagnosis
This new species resembles Yuelushannus barbatus sp. nov. as two-thirds of the male abdomen has a very distinct scutum, the cephalic lobe and pits are distinct, both male and female abdomen with four sigillae. Tibial apophyses densely covered with teeth, paracymbium hook-shaped. Epigyne with column-shaped copulatory ducts. It can be distinguished by:
General: In male, ocular region with wing-like spines which covers most of PMEs in Y. alatus sp. nov. ( Fig. 5 View Fig E–G), whereas wing-like spines are absent in Y. barbatus sp. nov. ( Fig. 10 View Fig A–B).
Male: Tibial apophyses short, distal end about as long as broad in Y. alatus sp. nov. ( Figs 1B View Fig , 2B View Fig ), about four times as long as broad in Y. barbatus sp. nov. ( Figs 6B View Fig , 7B View Fig ). Protegulum short, retained below the distal suprategular apophysis in Y. alatus sp. nov. ( Figs 1B View Fig , 2B View Fig ), long, extending above the distal suprategular apophysis in Y. barbatus sp. nov. ( Figs 6B View Fig , 7B View Fig ). The distal suprategular apophysis long, with bifurcated tip, extending above the apex of the cymbium in Y. alatus sp. nov. ( Figs 1 View Fig A–B, 2A–B), short, tip not bifurcated, retained below the apex of the cymbium in Y. barbatus sp. nov. ( Figs 6 View Fig A–B, 7). Distal end of anterior radical process not frayed in Y. alatus sp. nov. ( Figs 1 View Fig A–B, 2), whereas it is frayed in Y. barbatus sp. nov. ( Figs 6 View Fig A–B, 7).
Female: Spermathecae kidney-shaped in Y. alatus sp. nov. ( Figs 3–4 View Fig View Fig ), globular in Y. barbatus sp. nov. ( Figs 8–9 View Fig View Fig ).
Holotype
CHINA • ♂; Hunan Province, Liuyang City, Mudu Village, Dawei Mountain National Forest Park ; 28.43567° N, 114.03376° E; 14 Jan. 2018; alt. 286 m; Zhou Gu-chun, Wang Lu-yu and Liu Ke-ke leg.; HNU-HNDWS–18–04 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
CHINA • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; HNU-HNDWS–18–04-02~05 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype, HNU-HNDWS–18–04)
BODY. Total length 1.85, carapace 0.82 long, 0.71 wide, brown, cephalic lobe with distinct pits, ocular region with thick wing-like spines covering most of PMEs; fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct; clypeus 0.23 high ( Fig. 5A View Fig , E–G). Sternum wider than long, yellowish with spine-like hairs; labium wider than long; maxillae long, distal end broader, with scopulae ( Fig. 5B View Fig ). Chelicerae with six promarginal and five retromarginal teeth. Ocular region narrow, AER straight, PER procurved, PMEs present on cephalic lobe. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05; ALE 0.09; PME 0.06; PLE 0.07; AME–AME 0.02; PME–PME 0.05; AME–ALE 0.03; PME–PLE 0.05; AME–PME 0.10; ALE–ALE 0.32; PLE–PLE 0.33; ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I, 2.17 (0.65, 0.76, 0.44, 0.32); II, 1.9 (0.59, 0.67, 0.38, 0.26); III, 1.61 (0.51, 0.52, 0.35, 0.23); IV, 2.21 (0.65, 0.79, 0.46, 0.31). Leg formula IV–I–II–III. TmI 0.18 and TmIV 0.12. Tibial spine formula: 1–1–1–1. Abdomen round, 1.15 long, 0.88 wide, two-thirds of abdomen with distinct brown circle with four sigillae, lateral sides dusky grey, ventral side pale ( Fig. 5 View Fig A–B).
PALP ( Figs 1–2 View Fig View Fig ). Patella as long as tibia; tibia with one retrolateral and one dorsal trichobothrium, posterior margin with seven retrolateral spines in a row, dorsally with two tongue-shaped apophyses, densely covered with teeth; paracymbium hook-shaped, distal arm long, with slightly curved tip; tegulum with short transparent protegulum; distal suprategular apophysis sclerotized, with bifurcated tip, extends above apex of cymbium. Embolic division: tail piece long, slightly overlapping suprategulum; embolic membrane transparent, distal end broad; anterior radical process arc-shaped, sclerotized, as long as embolus, distal end slightly frayed; embolus arc-shaped, sclerotized, thick.
Female (allotype, HNDWS–18–04~02)
BODY. Total length 2.04. Carapace 0.86 long, 0.71 wide, yellowish, cephalic region slightly elevated ( Fig. 5A View Fig ); fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct ( Fig. 5A View Fig ); clypeus 0.21 high. Sternum wider than long, yellowish, with spine-like hairs; labium wider than long; maxillae long, distal end broader, with scopulae ( Fig. 5B View Fig ). Chelicerae with five promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Ocular region narrow, AER recurved, PER procurved, PER slightly wider. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05; ALE 0.07; PME 0.06; PLE 0.06; AME–AME 0.02; PME–PME 0.05; AME–ALE 0.03; PME–PLE 0.03; AME– PME 0.07; ALE–ALE 0.27; PLE–PLE 0.31; ALE–PLE 0.01. Length of legs: I, 2.2 (0.67, 0.77, 0.45, 0.31); II, 1.89 (0.59, 0.68, 0.36, 0.26); III, 1.72 (0.51, 0.57, 0.39, 0.25); IV, 2.24 (0.73, 0.77, 0.43, 0.31). Leg formula IV–I–II–III. TmI 0.17 and TmIV 0.12. Tibial spine formula: 1–1–1–1. Abdomen 1.18 long, 0.81 wide, all the other morphological characters similar to those of male ( Fig. 5 View Fig A–B).
EPIGYNE ( Figs 3–4 View Fig View Fig ). Ventral plate concave, covered with thick setae; posterior margin of dorsal plate with round scapus; copulatory openings present between dorsal and ventral plate; copulatory ducts long, column-shaped; spermathecae kidney-shaped, pointing towards scapus, separated by a distance of twothirds of their diameter; fertilization ducts small, extending mesally.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 11 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |