Stenus (Nestus) caseyi Puthz, 1972
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2012.13 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD8B1D59-D1F8-41D1-9BAB-A6FF12AD574F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3858648 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/803F87FD-C03D-FFDF-FDE8-A95BFAA6995E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Stenus (Nestus) caseyi Puthz, 1972 |
status |
|
Stenus (Nestus) caseyi Puthz, 1972 View in CoL
( Fig. 5F View Fig )
Stenus (Nestus) caseyi Puthz, 1972b: 172 View in CoL .
Stenus caseyi View in CoL – Puthz 1975b: 125.
Stenus (s. str.) caseyi View in CoL – Campbell & Davies 1991: 110.
Material examined
Holotype ♂, ‘[ USA] Michigan’, ‘ ♂ | Holotype’<printed red label with hand-written male symbol>, ‘ Stenus | caseyi | n. sp. | det. V. Puthz 1971’<standard Puthz’s determinative label> ( MNHG) .
USA: 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀, Mich. Berrien Co., 2 mi. N. New Buffalo, Gallien R. W bank, 2 Nov. 1980, litter in marsh, L.E. Watrous leg. ( FMNH) ; 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀, Wisconsin, Kenosha Co., Carol Beach, Chiwaukee Prairie , 24 Oct. 1980, FMHD #80-35 litter in wet grassy pockets, L. Watrous & W. Suter leg. ( FMNH) ; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, same locality, 1 May 1980, FMHD #80-3162, rhizomes, grasses at ditch, W.S. Suter leg. ( FMNH) ; 2 ♀♀, same locality, 19 Mar. 1974, W. Suter leg., FM( HD)#74-49, Ber.: litter in semi-dry ditch, WS#74-22b ( FMNH) ; 1 ♀, same locality, 4 Jun. 1974, W. Suter leg., FM( HD)#74-163, Ber.: Marsh floor at grass hummocks, WS#74-44a ( FMNH) ; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, same locality, 10 May 1975, W. Suter leg., FM( HD)#75-189, Ber.: grassy moss clumps marsh area ( FMNH) ; 1 ♂, same locality, 26 Apr. 1974, W. Suter leg., FM( HD)#74-66, Ber.: floor at cattails, WS#74-30D ( FMNH) ; 1 ♂, same locality, 26 Apr. 1974, W. Suter leg., FM( HD)#74-65, Ber.: sandy soil at water table, WS#74-30C ( FMNH) ; 1 ♀, same locality, 11 Sep. 1976, W. Suter leg., FM( HD)#76-160, WS#76-65b, temporary pond, floor peat ( FMNH) .
Remarks
The species was originally described from Michigan, USA, has subsequently been reported from Quebec, Canada ( Puthz 1975b) and also cited for the Canadian provinces Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia ( Campbell & Davies 1991) without citing material. The new data above widen the range to include Wisconsin. Since the genital preparation of the holotype had been somewhat deformed owing to excessively quick dehydration, the figure of the aedeagus in the original description was not quite adequate. Based on the available material, I herein provide a new figure for this structure (see Fig. 5F View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenus (Nestus) caseyi Puthz, 1972
Ryvkin, Alexandr B. 2012 |
Stenus (s. str.) caseyi
Campbell J. M. & Davies A. 1991: 110 |
Stenus caseyi
Puthz V. 1975: 125 |
Stenus (Nestus) caseyi
Puthz V. 1972: 172 |