Amphipteryx Selys 1853
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2531.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5309359 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/821C5515-781E-FFB1-FF3D-FCD14EBEFF75 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amphipteryx Selys 1853 |
status |
|
Amphipteryx Selys 1853 View in CoL
Amphipteryx Selys 1853: 66 View in CoL .
Type species. Amphipteryx agrioides Selys 1853 View in CoL , by original designation.
Other species included. Amphipteryx chiapensis González View in CoL -Soriano sp. nov., A. meridionalis González View in CoL - Soriano sp. nov, A. nataliae González-Soriano View in CoL sp. nov.
Characterization. Medium to large size (41–53 mm) robust zygopterans; head pale blue and black, postocular lobes large, convex, and extending posteriorly well beyond level of compound eye; thorax green or blue with black stripes; abdomen mostly black with some small greenish-blue spots at base; dorsum of S8–10 blue in male, in female with pale blue incomplete dorso-lateral stripes on S1-8 and dorsum of S8–10. Posterior lobe of pronotum either entire ( Figs. 1–2, 7–8 View FIGURES 1–13 ), with lateral projections ( Figs. 3–5, 9–12 View FIGURES 1–13 ), or erect laterally with smaller irregular v-shaped middle lobe ( Figs. 6, 13 View FIGURES 1–13 ). Costal space with five or more antenodal crossveins, which do not extend to subcostal space; costal side of pterostigma as long as 1/2 its posterior side (Figs. 14–17). Male anterior hamule approximately quadrangular, posterior hamule small, vestigial, vesica spermalis large, inflated posteriorly ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–23 ); male genital ligula with a pair of lateral lobes and a pair of apical lobes which do not form long flagellae ( Figs. 19–23 View FIGURES 18–23 ). Male cerci forcipate or roughly cylindrical and straight and armed infero-apically with a scalariform tooth ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 32–40 ), about as long as S10; paraproct well developed, slightly longer ( Figs. 24 View FIGURES 24–27 , 28 View FIGURES 28–31 ) to 0.5 as long as cercus ( Figs. 26–27 View FIGURES 24–27 , 30–31 View FIGURES 28–31 , 37–38 View FIGURES 32–40 ). Female ovipositor extending beyond posterior margin of S10 but not surpassing tip of cerci; outer valves with one row of denticles ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 32–40 ).
Diagnosis. Amphipteryx is one of two New World genera of Amphipterygidae . The other, Rimanella , is monotypic, represented by R. arcana ( Needham 1933) . The two are diagnosed in Garrison et al. (2010).
Distribution. Amphipteryx occurs at small mountain streams from Hidalgo, Oaxaca, Puebla and Veracruz states, Mexico, South into Guatemala and Honduras ( Figs. 41, 42 View FIGURES 41–42 ). A larva of Amphipteryx sp. , probably A. agrioides , was also discovered in western Mexico (Jalisco state, Río Cuitzmala, approx. 19º 22' N, 104º 59' W, in INECOL, Fig. 41 View FIGURES 41–42 ).
Biology. Adults perch with wings closed on vegetation overhanging water near seepages and small streams ( González-Soriano, 1991); larvae live in rough gravel and rapid-flow areas of small shallow creeks, and among leaf litter at lips of small waterfalls ( Novelo-Gutiérrez, 1995). With one exception (below), all Mexican populations are associated with tropical wet forests (i. e. cloud or rain forests), and the same is apparently the case with other Central American populations. The microhabitat of the larva from Jalisco differs from that described above. The Río Cuitzmala is almost at sea level within tropical deciduous forest. The larva which was collected there may have been drifted by the water current from the highlands where the forest is more humid.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Amphipteryx Selys 1853
González-Soriano, Enrique 2010 |
Amphipteryx
Selys 1853: 66 |