Neohelicomyces helicosporus J. Ma, Y. Z. Lu & K. D. Hyde, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/mycokeys.105.124129 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11456838 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/837ADFED-E1FE-5720-8AD6-2CE70FBB8DDC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Neohelicomyces helicosporus J. Ma, Y. Z. Lu & K. D. Hyde |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neohelicomyces helicosporus J. Ma, Y. Z. Lu & K. D. Hyde sp. nov.
Fig. 3 View Figure 3
Etymology.
The epithet “ helicosporus ” refers to the helicoid form of conidia.
Holotype.
HKAS 134923 View Materials .
Description.
Saprobic on decaying wood in a terrestrial habitat. Sexual morph Unknown from natural habitat. Asexual morph Hyphomycetous, helicosporous. Colonies on natural substrate superficial, effuse, gregarious, white. Mycelium semi-immersed, hyaline to pale brown, septate, branched hyphae, smooth, comprising glistening conidial mass. Conidiophores 105–199 μm long, 3–5.5 μm wide (x ¯ = 160.5 × 4 μm, n = 25), macronematous, mononematous, erect, curved, flexible at the tip, cylindrical, unbranched, septate, hyaline, smooth-, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 13–22 μm long, 2.5–4.5 μm wide (x ¯ = 16 × 3.5 μm, n = 20), holoblastic, monoblastic to polyblastic, integrated, sympodial, intercalary or terminal, cylindrical, with a denticulate protrusion, truncate at apex after conidial secession, hyaline, smooth-walled. Conidia solitary, acropleurogenous, helicoid, rounded at the tips, 15.5–18 μm in diameter and conidial filament 2.5–5 μm wide (x ¯ = 16.5 × 3.5 μm, n = 25), 103–170 μm long (x ¯ = 130 μm, n = 30), indistinctly multi-septate, coiled up to 3 ¾ times, becoming loosely coiled in water, guttulate, hyaline, smooth-walled.
Culture characteristics.
Conidia producing germ tubes on PDA within 9 hours of incubation at 25 ° C. Colonies on PDA are irregular with umbonate surface and filiform edge, reaching 43 mm diameter after 48 days of incubation at 25 ° C, top view of colony reddish-brown to black brown, reverse brown to black brown.
Material examined.
China, Guizhou Province, Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Lianhuan Town, on decaying wood in a terrestrial habitat, 17 March 2022, Jian Ma, LHX 8 ( HKAS 134923 , holotype; GZAAS 23–0623 , isotype), ex-type living cultures GZCC 23–0633 ; Ibid., LHX 8.1 ( GZAAS 23–0624 , paratype), living culture GZCC 23–0634 .
Notes.
Our isolates ( GZCC 23–0633 and GZCC 23–0634 ) are morphologically similar to Neohelicomyces hainanensis ( Lu et al. 2022) , but the phylogenetic analyses revealed that GZCC 23–0633 and GZCC 23–0634 cluster together and this clade is sister to N. hyalosporus ( GZCC 16–0086 ) with 100 % ML / 1.00 PP support (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The polymorphism nucleotides comparison of ITS, LSU, tef 1 α and rpb 2 sequence data between GZCC 23–0633 and Neohelicomyces hyalosporus ( GZCC 16–0086 ), reveals nucleotide base differences of 29 / 527 bp (5.5 %, including thirteen gaps), 2 / 844 bp (0.2 %, including 0 gap), 27 / 892 bp (3.0 %, including 0 gap) and 37 / 893 bp (4.1 %, including 0 gap), respectively. Additionally, our species displays a reddish-brown pigmentation on PDA, but this feature was not observed in N. hainanensis and N. hyalosporus ( Lu et al. 2018 b, 2022). Furthermore, our species differs from N. hainanensis in having longer conidia (103–170 μm vs. up to 136 μm) and from N. hyalosporus in having shorter conidiophores (105–199 μm vs. 210–290 μm) ( Lu et al. 2018 b, 2022). Therefore, based on the phylogenetic and morphological differences, we introduce N. helicosporus herein as a novel species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |