Barypalpus shibatai, Schillhammer, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4629.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:44CC2346-3877-4AAA-8A54-8F196E4DA03C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5921167 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8759EC6B-FFAD-6917-FF5B-F8A1FC3F206D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Barypalpus shibatai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Barypalpus shibatai View in CoL sp. n.
Holotype ♂: “N-LAOS, May 1999, Oudom Xai prov. , Nam Miang riv., 30km SE Muang Xai, 1200m, Lao coll. leg.” ( NSMT) .— Paratype: 1 ♂: same data as holotype ( NMW) .
Description (Habitus: Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ): 9.3–9.8 mm long (4.8–5.1 mm, abdomen excluded). Black, shining; mandibles dark brown, palpi and labrum pale reddish, antennae reddish brown; posterior margins of tergites V–VII narrowly dark reddish, that of tergite VII more broadly reddish, tergite VIII black with almost posterior half reddish; legs black to dark brown, protarsi reddish, meso- and metatarsi of similar color as tibiae at base, becoming paler distad, tarsomeres V usually reddish.
Head ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9–12 ) rounded quadrangular, 1.21–1.23 times as wide as long, tempora subparallel or slightly divergent, 1.5–1.6 times as long as eyes, dorsal surface with only a few larger setiferous punctures along medial margin of eyes, on tempora and along base of head; hind angles of head broadly rounded; surface without microsculpture or with very faint, almost indiscernible traces of isodiametric microsculpture, in addition, with moderately dense micropunctation; antennae moderately long, segments 4–5 slightly oblong, segments 6–8 about as long as wide, segments 9 and 10 slightly transverse; pronotum slightly oblong, 1.06–1.10 times as long as wide, sides subparallel, in one specimen (paratype) slightly more distinctly narrowed posteriad than anteriad, surface without any setiferous punctures, micropunctation much less dense than on head, isodiametric microsculpture hardly discernible or lacking; scutellum moderately coarsely and moderately densely punctate; elytra ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13–16 ) along sides markedly longer than pronotum along midline, with moderately dense and moderately coarse punctation, becoming somewhat finer laterad, with a longitudinal row of larger punctures sublaterally, hypomera densely, moderately coarsely punctate; abdominal characters hardly differing from those of B. ruficornis .
Aedeagus ( Figs 19, 20 View FIGURES 17–24 , 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ) with apical portion of median lobe widened as in B. ruficornis in ventral view ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17–24 ), in lateral view ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–24 ) slightly bent toward paramere but not hooked, paramere ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ) almost as long as median lobe, slightly narrowed toward apex, broad in lateral view, peg setae irregularly arranged in two diffuse longitudinal subapical clusters, regular setae rather short.
Female unknown.
Diagnosis: The species differs from both B. ruficornis and B. holzschuhi by the larger eyes, from the latter by the broader head and sparser, more irregular elytral punctation, and from B. chinensis by the darker color and broader head.
Distribution: The species is known only from the type locality.
Etymology: The species is named in honor of Yasutoshi Shibata, staphylinid expert from Japan, who has provided me with highly interesting material during the past two decades.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |