Electra asiatica, Grischenko & Dick & Mawatari, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930701391773 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/877A7251-CC5D-DE20-FE35-24D9D3C2191B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Electra asiatica |
status |
sp. nov. |
Electra asiatica View in CoL new species
( Figure 5 View Figure 5 ) Electra crustulenta var. baltica: Kubanin 1976, p 31 . Electra baltica: Kubanin 1997, p 121 ; Grischenko 2002, p 113 (part). Electra arctica: Nikulina 2006, p 28 , Figure 5A–C View Figure 5 .
Diagnosis
Colony coherent; opesia large; gymnocyst well developed; cryptocyst moderately well developed, the entire rim crenulate; chitinous spine well developed; base of spine variable in size; chitinized operculum contrasting sharply in colour with the transparent frontal membrane; colony uniserial only near ancestrula, rapidly giving rise to fan-shaped coherent sheets.
Etymology
The species name refers to this species’ distribution in the northwestern (Asiatic) Pacific.
Material examined
Holotype: BAC, colony on bivalve shell (NHM 2006.2.27.19) . Paratypes: BAC, colony on bivalve shell (NHM 2006.2.27.20) ; BAC, colony on bivalve shell (NHM 2006.2.27.21); KAI, colony on rock (NHM 2006.2.27.22); MIN, colony on rock (NHM 2006.2.27.23), colony on rock (NHM 2006.2.27.24). Additional material: 84 specimens from Akkeshi and one colony on a barnacle ( Balanus sp. ) fragment, Ptichiy Island (57 ° 109N, 156 ° 359E), western Kamchatka shelf, Sea of Okhotsk , lower intertidal, collected by A. V. Grischenko , 6 September 1992 .
Description
Colony encrusting, unilaminar, radiating in coherent, fan-shaped lobes ( Figure 5A, B View Figure 5 ) from point of origin, forming circular patches up to 2.8 cm across, whitish or light-yellowish when alive. Zooids oblong hexagonal, barrel-shaped, oval, or subrectangular, rounded distally, 0.45–0.80 mm long (0.56¡ 0.07 mm), 0.21–0.35 mm wide (0.30¡ 0.03 mm), arranged in linear series with almost parallel lateral walls, separated by deep grooves; boundaries between transverse walls indistinct; proximal frontal wall transversely convex. Mural rim raised, sharp. Cryptocyst ( Figures 5E, F, H View Figure 5 ) narrower and nearly vertical distally and laterally, wider and gradually sloping proximally, granulated just inside mural rim, smooth around opesial margin. Basal wall calcified. Opesia oval, elliptical, or roundedquadrate in outline, 0.25–0.48 mm long (0.36¡ 0.05 mm), 0.16–0.25 mm wide (0.20¡ 0.02 mm), occupying 60–80% of zooidal length. Frontal membrane thin, transparent; operculum strongly chitinized, semicircular, a sharply contrasting bright brown in colour. Gymnocyst ( Figures 5C–F View Figure 5 ) smooth, relatively narrow distally and laterally, usually elongate and tapering proximally, often with minute transverse striations. In most zooids, the gymnocyst proximal to opesia rises to a conspicuous boss bearing a pointed chitinous spine ( Figure 5D View Figure 5 ). Zooids interconnect by three to five circular multiporous septula in each lateral wall and by numerous small pores in basal half of distal wall. Avicularia, lateral spines, ovicells, and hibernacules absent. Small kenozooids ( Figure 5F View Figure 5 ) of irregular shape and size occur sparsely among autozooids; these are completely ringed by a granular cryptocyst and have a small, roughly circular opesia. Ancestrula ( Figure 5G View Figure 5 ) tatiform, small, oval, about 0.40 mm long, 0.28 mm wide; opesia oval, 0.21 mm long, 0.18 mm wide. Ancestrula buds one ( Figure 5B View Figure 5 ) or two ( Figure 5A, G View Figure 5 ) small zooids distally and another proximally ( Figure 5A, G View Figure 5 ) or proximolaterally.
Remarks
Among congeners, E. asiatica most closely resembles E. baltica ( Borg, 1931) in having a similarly coherent colony, a large opesia, and a chitinized operculum contrasting sharply in colour with the transparent frontal membrane. Both species commonly have, proximal to the opesia, a knob terminating in a pointed chitinous spine. However, unlike E. baltica , chains of zooids of E. asiatica radiate and anastomose only close to the ancestrula, and subsequently form only fan-shaped multiserial sheets that do not diverge again into uniserial chains. In E. asiatica , the proximal gymnocyst is more extensive and the opesia is proportionately smaller than in E. baltica . Owing to the general similarity between these two species, previous investigators have likely interpreted the differences in zooid size and colony form as intraspecific variation in a single species, E. baltica . The records of E. baltica by Kubanin (1976, 1997) from numerous localities in the Far Eastern seas appear to be misidentifications of E. asiatica ; a specimen from the intertidal zone of Ptichiy Island ( Figure 5H View Figure 5 ) proved to be this species.
At Akkeshi, E. asiatica is often found growing close to E. korobokkura on the same substratum, particularly on dead bivalve shells. Electra asiatica has larger zooids than E. korobokkura (compare Figure 5C–E, H View Figure 5 with Figure 3D View Figure 3 at the same scale), a difference readily apparent in specimens close to one another. Nikulina (2006) illustrated and discussed this size difference, but identified the species with larger zooids as E. arctica .
Distribution
We consider Kubanin’s (1976, 1997) E. baltica to be synonymous with E. asiatica . To the extent that all of Kubanin’s records represent correct identifications of the latter, E. asiatica is widely distributed in the northwestern Pacific: southeastern Kamchatka (Kamchatsky, Kronotsky, and Avacha Gulfs); northern and northeastern coast of the Sea of Okhotsk (southwestern Kamchatka; Penzhinskaya, Gizhiginskaya, Yamskaya, and Taujskaya Inlets; Okhotsk; Ayan; Zavyalov Island); southern and southeastern coast of Sakhalin Island (Terpeniya and Aniva Gulfs); northern Sea of Japan (southwestern coast of Sakhalin Island and Moneron Island). Akkeshi Bay is the southernmost known locality.
BAC |
Beijing Agricultural College |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.