Sparus elegantulus, (Koken, 1888)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.814.1745 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:74226488-DE8B-4A64-B1D4-A24C15AE79F6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6492736 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/897AA073-FFF1-3929-E952-C2BFFAE15338 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sparus elegantulus |
status |
|
“ Sparus ” elegantulus ( Koken, 1888)
Fig. 36G–L View Fig
Otolithus (Pagelli) elegantulus Koken, 1888: 279 , pl. 17 figs 5–6.
“genus Sparidarum ” elegantulus – Nolf 1985: 88; 2003: 6, pl. 2 figs 1–2. — Nolf & Stringer 2003: pl. 6 figs 6–11.
“ Sparida ” elegantula – Nolf 2013: 103, pl. 264.
Remarks
Otoliths of “ S.” elegantulus show typical sparid affinities, but allocation to any Recent genus was not satisfactory. Therefore, we here follow Nolf’s (1985, 2013) interpretation, considering the taxon as an incertae sedis at the generic level. The dorsal rim of the otoliths of “ S.” elegantulus appears to have the highest variability. See also remarks under Centropristis priaboniana for comparative purposes.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution
Lutetian: Weches Formation and “Stone City beds”, Texas; Piney Point Formation, Virginia. Bartonian: Cook Mountain Formation, Texas and Mississippi; “upper” Lisbon Formation, Alabama; Moodys Branch Formation, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. Priabonian: Yazoo Clay, Louisiana.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sparus elegantulus
Lin, Chien-Hsiang & Nolf, Dirk 2022 |
Otolithus (Pagelli) elegantulus
Koken E. 1888: 279 |