Novius rufopilosus ( Mulsant, 1850 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5311.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E28EEF2-38B4-412F-80C1-CC958A9B7B26 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8095446 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A2A223E-EA49-FF84-02D6-7002B2C4F86D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Novius rufopilosus ( Mulsant, 1850 ) |
status |
|
Novius rufopilosus ( Mulsant, 1850)
( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 )
Rodolia rufopilosa Mulsant, 1850: 903 .
Rodolia rowlandi Crotch, 1874: 281 .- Pang et al. 2020: 20.
Novius rufopilosus: Pang et al. 2020: 20 View Cited Treatment .
Notes. Poorani (2002) included it in the Indian checklist with a comment by R.G. Booth that “records of R. rufopilosa Mulsant (1850: 903) , a Chinese species, from India are probably erroneous”. But Pang et al. (2020) listed India in its distribution range. The holotype (BMNH) is illustrated here ( Fig. 24a–c View FIGURE 24 ). Ren et al. (2009) illustrated the habitus and male genitalia.
Distribution. China (Shannxi, Gansu, Xizang, Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Jiangxi, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hong Kong). Vietnam. Myanmar. India. Philippines. Sumatra. Oriental Region.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Novius rufopilosus ( Mulsant, 1850 )
Poorani, J. 2023 |
Rodolia rowlandi
Pang, H. & Tang, X. F. & Booth, R. G. & Vandenberg, N. & Forrester, J. & McHugh, J. & Slipinski, A. 2020: 20 |
Crotch, G. R. 1874: 281 |
Rodolia rufopilosa
Mulsant, E. 1850: 903 |