Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1212.127537 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1CB1D48B-D756-4539-8351-5ACCD406C9E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13784745 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A2D2336-7C05-5033-B9BD-704EF661CBD9 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904 |
status |
|
Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904 View in CoL
Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904 View in CoL . Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology) 25: 166.
Type species.
Eulophus auripunctatus Ashmead.
Diagnosis.
Subtorular sulci present; clypeus delimited laterally only (sometimes weakly so); occiput without vertical groove or weak fold between occipital margin and occipital foramen; postmarginal vein usually shorter (0.1–0.8 ×) than stigmal vein (but 2.3–3.2 × as long in species group neeigena); midlobe of mesoscutum with one pair of setae (2–3 pairs in a few species); notauli poorly delimited or missing in posterior part; petiolar foramen rounded triangular; petiole very short, as a narrow band (as long as wide in a very few species); male phallobase: digitus with one spine (a few species with two spines (mainly the species in group planiseta), digitus is missing in species group laeviscuta) ( Hansson 2004).
Species group auripunctata
Diagnosis. Midlobe of mesoscutum with one pair of setae; flagellomeres with short and asymmetric sensilla; digitus in male genitalia with one spine ( Hansson 2004).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904
O’Loughlin, Brendan, Brandão-Dias, Pedro F. P., Gates, Michael W. & Egan, Scott P. 2024 |
Chrysonotomyia
Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904 . Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology) 25: 166. |