Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2020v41a3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7826227 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A5DBB36-FFA0-2902-FCFC-FDF2FB57F911 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm |
status |
|
Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm View in CoL View at ENA
Mycologia 102 (2): 432 (2010).
DESCRIPTION AND ILLUSTRATION. — SeeAbdel-Wahab et al. (2014).
DISTRIBUTION. — Australia, Saudi Arabia.
NOTES
Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL has characters that are common to the Diatrypaceae View in CoL , but the ellipsoidal ascospores, with a germ slit are unique. Members of Diatrypaceae View in CoL usually have allantoid ascospores and lack germ pores or slits ( Chalkley et al. 2010; Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014). However, the original authors did not fully characterize the morphology of the fungus on natural substrates, apparently because of a lack of material (Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014). Abdel-Wahab et al. (2014) re-described this fungus based on a culture isolated from unidentified driftwood at Yanbu beach, Saudi Arabia. This isolate of Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL was different from the type species in having larger, deeply immersed ascomata (Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014). However, the difference between the two collections did not warrant separation at the species level. The strain from Saudi Arabia (Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014) produced holoblastic conidia singly, while in the type strain, the conidiophores proliferated either sympodially or annellidically, or possibly by a combination of both, producing conidia on minute denticles ( Chalkley et al. 2010). Abdel-Wahab et al. (2014) noted that LSU sequences of the two strains were 99% similar. According to our phylogenetic analysis with combined ITS+Btub Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL groups in a clade (clade K) comprising Monosporascus cannonballus View in CoL (ATCC 26931 and CMM3646) as a basal lineage ( Fig. 1 View FIG ). ITS analysis yielded a single clade (clade M) comprising Halocryptovalsa salicorniae Dayarathne & K.D.Hyde View in CoL , sp. nov. (MFLUCC 15-0185) and Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL but with no statistical support ( Fig. 2 View FIG ). These two species are morphologically different from each other.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm
Dayarathne, Monika C., Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N., Devadatha, B., Abeywickrama, Pranami, G, E. B., Jones, areth, Chomnunti, Putarak, Sarma, V. V., Hyde, Kevin D., Lumyong, Saisamorn, C., Eric H. & Mckenzie 2020 |
Halocryptovalsa salicorniae Dayarathne & K.D.Hyde
Dayarathne & K. D. Hyde 2020 |