Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm

Dayarathne, Monika C., Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N., Devadatha, B., Abeywickrama, Pranami, G, E. B., Jones, areth, Chomnunti, Putarak, Sarma, V. V., Hyde, Kevin D., Lumyong, Saisamorn, C., Eric H. & Mckenzie, 2020, Modern taxonomic approaches to identifying diatrypaceous fungi from marine habitats, with a novel genus Halocryptovalsa Dayarathne & K. D. Hyde, gen. nov., Cryptogamie, Mycologie 20 (3), pp. 21-67 : 48

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2020v41a3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7826227

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A5DBB36-FFA0-2902-FCFC-FDF2FB57F911

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm
status

 

Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm View in CoL View at ENA

Mycologia 102 (2): 432 (2010).

DESCRIPTION AND ILLUSTRATION. — SeeAbdel-Wahab et al. (2014).

DISTRIBUTION. — Australia, Saudi Arabia.

NOTES

Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL has characters that are common to the Diatrypaceae View in CoL , but the ellipsoidal ascospores, with a germ slit are unique. Members of Diatrypaceae View in CoL usually have allantoid ascospores and lack germ pores or slits ( Chalkley et al. 2010; Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014). However, the original authors did not fully characterize the morphology of the fungus on natural substrates, apparently because of a lack of material (Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014). Abdel-Wahab et al. (2014) re-described this fungus based on a culture isolated from unidentified driftwood at Yanbu beach, Saudi Arabia. This isolate of Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL was different from the type species in having larger, deeply immersed ascomata (Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014). However, the difference between the two collections did not warrant separation at the species level. The strain from Saudi Arabia (Abdel-Wahab et al. 2014) produced holoblastic conidia singly, while in the type strain, the conidiophores proliferated either sympodially or annellidically, or possibly by a combination of both, producing conidia on minute denticles ( Chalkley et al. 2010). Abdel-Wahab et al. (2014) noted that LSU sequences of the two strains were 99% similar. According to our phylogenetic analysis with combined ITS+Btub Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL groups in a clade (clade K) comprising Monosporascus cannonballus View in CoL (ATCC 26931 and CMM3646) as a basal lineage ( Fig. 1 View FIG ). ITS analysis yielded a single clade (clade M) comprising Halocryptovalsa salicorniae Dayarathne & K.D.Hyde View in CoL , sp. nov. (MFLUCC 15-0185) and Diatrypasimilis australiensis View in CoL but with no statistical support ( Fig. 2 View FIG ). These two species are morphologically different from each other.

Kingdom

Fungi

Phylum

Ascomycota

Class

Sordariomycetes

Order

Xylariales

Family

Diatrypaceae

Genus

Diatrypasimilis

Loc

Diatrypasimilis australiensis J.J.Zhou & Kohlm

Dayarathne, Monika C., Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N., Devadatha, B., Abeywickrama, Pranami, G, E. B., Jones, areth, Chomnunti, Putarak, Sarma, V. V., Hyde, Kevin D., Lumyong, Saisamorn, C., Eric H. & Mckenzie 2020
2020
Loc

Halocryptovalsa salicorniae Dayarathne & K.D.Hyde

Dayarathne & K. D. Hyde 2020
2020
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF