Cestoplana rubrocincta ( Grube, 1840 ) Lang 1884
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4312.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F0Fbac1A-1F1E-4139-A366-74186C2F41D6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6023886 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8C5DC81D-FF9B-7D51-02AA-F8EEAD27F1C9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cestoplana rubrocincta ( Grube, 1840 ) Lang 1884 |
status |
|
Cestoplana rubrocincta ( Grube, 1840) Lang 1884 View in CoL
( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 Q)
Orthostomum rubrocinctum Grube, 1840, 56 Orthostoma rubrocincta ( Grube, 1840) Örsted 1844 , 75 Typhlolepta rubrocincta ( Grube, 1840) Stimpson 1857 , 3 Cestoplana australis Haswell, 1907 , 479, fig.
Cestoplana filiformis Laidlaw, 1903 View in CoL , 110
Type locality. Mediterranean Sea ( Grube 1840).
Distribution. Kenya ( Laidlaw 1903); Cape Verde ( Laidlaw 1906); Susaki and Seto, Japan ( Kato 1937); Naples and Sicily, Italy ( Kato 1944); Port Jackson, Australia ( Kato 1944); Bay Weligama, Sri Lanka ( Kato 1944); Bay Gaira, Colombia ( Quiroga 2008); Canary Archipelago: El Medano, Tenerife (De Vera et al. 2009) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , T4; Table 1 and 2).
Biology. De Vera and collaborators (2009) found Cestoplana rubrocinta in the intertidal zone at depths of 1 metre, in the spring time.
Taxonomic remarks. Characterised by an elongated, ribbon-shaped body, background colour pale orange, almost transparent or whitish, and three thin orange longitudinal lines, two marginal and one along the middle longitudinal body. Without tentacles or pseudotentacles.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cestoplana rubrocincta ( Grube, 1840 ) Lang 1884
Noreña, Carolina 2017 |
Cestoplana filiformis
Laidlaw 1903 |