Megistopalpus Guillebeau, 1895
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3605.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:19CFDC67-4FCB-431D-8BF2-80EEB9EC76A4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8C75C266-1007-2865-2286-F9DE7F01CDCC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Megistopalpus Guillebeau, 1895 |
status |
|
9. Megistopalpus Guillebeau, 1895
( Figs. 2f View FIGURE 2 ; 39a, b View FIGURE 39 )
Megapalpus Guillebeau 1893 b: 297 View in CoL . Type species: Megapalpus simoni Guillebeau 1893 , fixed by monotypy.
Megistopalpus Guillebeau 1895 : xxvii. [replacement name for Megapalpus Guillebeau, 1893 View in CoL ]
Type material. Megapalpus simoni Guillebeau : one syntype found, here designated as lectotype, point mounted, “ Aden [handwritten] // Megapalpus \ Simoni \ Guilb. [handwritten] // LECTOTYPE \ Megapalpus \ simoni Guillebeau \ des. M.L. Gimmel 2009 [red label]” ( MNHN). Two specimens were mentioned in the original description. The lectotype is designated in order to stabilize the generic and specific names.
Diagnosis. The only phalacrid whose maxillary palps approximate the length of the antennae. Otherwise quite similar to Pseudolibrus , with a protibial ctenidium, large scutellar shield, and nine nearly complete, distinct elytral striae, though members of the latter genus are smaller (2.7 mm or less).
Description. Large, total length 3.2 mm. Color solid testaceous ( Fig. 39a View FIGURE 39 ). Tibial spur formula 2-2-2, tarsal formula 5-5- 5 in female, male unknown.
Head. Not constricted behind eyes. Eyes medium-sized; facets convex; weakly emarginate medially; without posterior emargination; periocular groove absent. Frontoclypeus not emarginate above antennal insertion; clypeal apex arcuate-truncate. Antennal club loosely 3-segmented, club weakly asymmetrical; antennomere XI weakly turbinate. Maxillary palp ( Fig. 2f View FIGURE 2 ; Fig. 39b View FIGURE 39 ) extremely long, approaching length of antenna, palpomeres II–IV flattened, clavate, palpomere II longest. Labial palp unmodified, labial palpomere III elongate, fusiform.
Thorax. Pronotum with scattered microsetae; without scutellar lobe. Procoxal cavity with anterolateral notchlike extension; prosternal process weakly angulate in lateral view, somewhat setose preapically, without spinelike setae at apex. Protibia with ctenidium on kickface extending about one-third length of tibia. Scutellar shield large, about as long as greatest length of eye. Elytron without spectral iridescence; with nine distinct, moreor-less complete impunctate striae (including sutural), medialmost stria somewhat convergent apically, second stria (first discal) fusing with sutural stria before apex; with distinct transverse strigae, strongest laterally; lateral margin with row of tiny, sawtooth-like setae. Mesoventral plate notched anteriorly, not extending posteriorly to metaventrite, forming procoxal rests; mesoventral disc depressed medially, setose; mesanepisternum with complete transverse carina; mesocoxae approximate, separated by less than half width of a coxal cavity. Mesotarsomere III not bilobed. Metaventral process extending anteriorly just to halfway point of mesocoxae; metaventral postcoxal lines not separated from mesocoxal cavity margin; discrimen long, extending more than halfway to anterior margin of metaventral process. Anterior margin of metacoxa with emargination sublaterally; metacoxal plate with transverse line; metatibial foreface with apical ctenidium straight, perpendicular overall to long axis of tibia; spurs cylindrical, longest spur greater than width of tibial apex; metatarsomere I longer than metatarsomere II, but shorter than remainder of tarsus, joint between I and II rigid.
Abdomen. Abdominal ventrite I without paired lines.
Immature stages. Unknown.
Bionomics. Unknown.
Distribution and diversity. Known only from the lectotype collected in Yemen (“ Aden ”) and from a Somali specimen (MSNG). The two may not be conspecific.
Included species (1):
Megistopalpus simoni (Guillebeau, 1893) (Distribution: Yemen) (type!)
Discussion. Since the genus is known only from two specimens, one a primary type, I did not disarticulate a member of this morphologically interesting genus for examination under a compound scope. Accordingly, the description above is relatively scanty and the genus was excluded from the phylogenetic analysis. However, based on external morphology it is quite similar to the genus Pseudolibrus , therefore I have included it in the Pseudolibrus -group.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Megistopalpus Guillebeau, 1895
Gimmel, Matthew L. 2013 |
Megapalpus
Guillebeau, F. 1893: 297 |