Paracymbiomma doisirmaos, Rodrigues & Cizauskas & Rheims, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B674EE1E-57C0-4FC5-B855-AED8FA6596EA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5957141 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D1487E6-5418-FFBD-FF2D-F305FDB074DA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paracymbiomma doisirmaos |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paracymbiomma doisirmaos sp. nov.
Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–6 , 15 View FIGURES 13–18 , 53, 54 View FIGURES 53–56 , 69 View FIGURES 69–74 , 75 View FIGURES 75
Type material. Male holotype from Brazil, Pernambuco, Recife (Horto Dois Irmãos), [08°03'00''S 34°59'17''W], 30 May–02 June 2001, Equipe Biota leg., deposited in IBSP 68673. Paratypes with same data as holotype: 2 males ( IBSP 219463 View Materials ), 1 male ( IBSP 68674 View Materials ) and 1 male ( IBSP 68674 View Materials ) .
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition and refers to the type locality.
Diagnosis. Males of P. doisirmaos sp.nov. resemble those of P. angelim sp. nov. and P. bocaina sp. nov. in having six eyes ( Figs 14–16 View FIGURES 13–18 ). They differ from P. bocaina sp. nov. in having PME completely formed and male palp with rounded tegulum (ovoid in P. bocaina sp. nov.), and from P. angelim sp. nov. in having male palp with median apophysis large and twisted at base (hook-shaped in P. angelim sp. nov.) and triangular RTA without constricted tip (RTA with robust base and constricted tip in P. angelim sp. nov.) ( Figs 53, 54 View FIGURES 53–56 ).
Description. Male (holotype). Total length: 2.3. Carapace 0.97 long, 0.85 wide; abdomen 1.12 long, 0.7 wide; sternum 0.65 long, 0.55 wide; spinnerets 0.23 long, 0.09 wide. Six eyes arranged in two triads. AME absent. Eye diameters and interdistances: ALE 0.062; PLE 0.05; PME 0.041; ALE–ALE 0.058; PLE–ALE 0.020; PME–ALE 0.016; PME–PLE 0.033; PME–PME 0.062. Chelicerae 0.38 long; one retromarginal tooth and four promarginal teeth. Leg formula 4123; measurements: I: 2.89 (0.86, 0.45, 0.64, 0.5, 0.44); II: 2.7 (0.76, 0.44, 0.58, 0.48, 0.44); III: 2.28 (0.65, 0.32, 0.45, 0.42, 0.44); IV: 3.21 (0.86, 0.42, 0.70, 0.68, 0.55). Leg spination: I – femur d1-1-0, p0-0- 1; tibia v2-2 -0; metatarsus v2 -0-0. II – femur d1-1-0; tibia v0-1r-1r; metatarsus v2 -0-0. III – femur d1-1-0, p0-0-1; tibia d0-1-0, p0-1-1, r0-1-1, v0-2-2; metatarsus p0-1-1, r0-1-0, v2 -0- 3. IV – femur d1-1-2; tibia d0-1-0, p1-0-1, r0- 1-1, v1 p-2-2; metatarsus d0-1r-0, p1-0-1, r3-0-0, v1 p-3-3. Palp: femur with three spines, two dorsal and one prolateral; median apophysis large and twisted at base, retrolaterally directed; embolar insertion between 9-12 o’clock position ( Figs 53, 54 View FIGURES 53–56 ).
Female: Unknown.
Variation. Total length (3 males): total 2.0–2.3.
Distribution. Pernambuco, Brazil ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 75 ).
Other material examined. None.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |