Neophemini, Smith & Thom & Joseph, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.468.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D5487F9-9C5B-FFC2-FF85-FDD34B802935 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neophemini |
status |
trib. nov. |
Neophemini Schodde, Mason, Smith, Thom,
and Joseph, 2024, new tribe
ZooBank registration: urn:lsid:zoobank.
org:act: 7156B56E-42BF-4410-AAB4- 2C3A84628231
DIAGNOSIS: Small, usually plain-plumaged parrots without transverse barring or black chevroning, e.g., dorsal feathers in Pezoporus are transversely barred black and yellow in their centers but broadly fringed with green, whereas in Neophema and Neopsephotus the dorsal feathers are plain green or dusky brown, respectively; unmarked outer rectrices with extensive yellow (or white) tips and dark bases; remiges with white to yellowish white bar on inner vanes evanescent, earliest in adult males, hardly extending on to outer vanes and usually obscure on upper surface of wing; pale “submissive” spot present in nape down; underwing coverts rich dark blue, often brighter on bend of wing; hypotarsal flexor tendon arrangement approaching ancestral condition: deep flexor tendons enclosed in separate bony canals, superficial tendon musculus flexor perforatus digiti II enclosed in a separate canal, and remaining superficial tendons external and separated in two separated shallow grooves on plantar wall; usually colonial, in small groups; foraging on ground and low shrubs and nesting in tree hollows (scrapes under rocks in Neophema petrophila ); nestling begging call a husky quavering note that increases in time-frequency with age developing into bursts of brief whistles. In accordance with Article 13.1.2, we note that gross phenotypic differences have been well-illustrated and described on many occasions in the literature and we cite as examples reference works on the world’s parrots (e.g., Forshaw and Knight, 2010; Juniper and Parr, 1998). This tribe comprises the genera Neophema and Neopsephotus . TYPE GENUS: Neophema Salvadori, 1891 , Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum 20: 539, 569, by original designation. Type species: Psittacus pulchellus Shaw, 1792 = Nephema (Neophema) pulchella (Shaw, 1792) . TAXONOMIC POSITION OF THE TRIBE: Subfamily Platycercinae in the Family Psittaculidae . COMPONENT GENERA: Neopsephotus and Neophema .
Neopsephotus Mathews, 1912 View in CoL . Novitates
Zoologicae 18: 279 – type species:
Neopsephotus bourkii (Gould, 1841) ,
by monotypy.
Neophema Salvadori, 1891 View in CoL . Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum 20:
539, 569 – type species: Psittacus pulchellus Shaw, 1792 = Neophema (Neophema) pulchella (Shaw, 1792) View in CoL , by original designation.
subgenus Neophema subgenus Neonanodes Mathews, 1912 .
Novitates Zoologicae 18: 279 – type species: Psittacus chrysogaster Latham ,
1790 = Neophema (Neonanodes)
chrysogaster (Latham, 1790) , by monotypy. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Australia and some of its offshore islands including Tasmania.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Neophemini
Smith, Brian Tilston, Thom, Gregory & Joseph, Leo 2024 |
Neopsephotus
Mathews 1912 |
Neonanodes
Mathews 1912 |
Neophema
Salvadori 1891 |
Psittacus pulchellus
Shaw 1792 |