Panjange camiguin Huber
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2015.169 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB0E51AB-C0E6-4054-AFED-939D14BD1EFB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6095775 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A8245A4A-D792-4023-8E50-0922A9C29FD6 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:A8245A4A-D792-4023-8E50-0922A9C29FD6 |
treatment provided by |
Jeremy |
scientific name |
Panjange camiguin Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Panjange camiguin Huber View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A8245A4A-D792-4023-8E50-0922A9C29FD6
Figs 8–10 View Figs 2 – 15 , 35–63 View Figs 35 – 37 View Figs 38 – 44 View Figs 45 – 49 View Figs 50 – 58 View Figs 59 – 63
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from closest known relatives ( Pa. malagos Huber sp. nov.; Pa. casaroro Huber sp. nov.) by morphology of male palps ( Figs 38–39 View Figs 38 – 44 ; symmetric modiFcations of trochanter and femur; asymmetric shapes of procursi; Figs 41–44 View Figs 38 – 44 ), by proximally modiFed male chelicerae (densely covered with small scales; Fig. 47 View Figs 45 – 49 ), and by strong internal sclerite in female genitalia ( Fig. 37 View Figs 35 – 37 ). From most congeners (except Pa. casaroro Huber sp. nov.) also by contiguous tips of male ocular processes ( Figs 35 View Figs 35 – 37 , 45, 48–49 View Figs 45 – 49 ); from Pa. casaroro Huber sp. nov. also by absence of process between eye stalks ( Fig. 35 View Figs 35 – 37 ), and by simple epigynal scape ( Fig. 36 View Figs 35 – 37 ; not with two distal lobes).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
PHILIPPINES: holotype Ƌ, in ZFMK ( Ar 13002 ), Camiguin Island, Katibawasan Falls (9.215°N, 124.720°E), 300 m a.s.l., on leaves , 19 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, P.N. Banaag) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
PHILIPPINES: Camiguin Island: 7 ƋƋ, 17 ♀♀, 1 juv. in ZFMK ( Ar 13003, 13004 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, 2 juvs in pure ethanol, in ZFMK ( Phi 235 ), same data GoogleMaps ; 2 ƋƋ, 2 ♀♀, 2 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 13005 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, all poorly preserved, same locality, 5–6 May 2014 (E.P. Mondejar) GoogleMaps ; 2 ƋƋ, 7 ♀♀, 1 juv. in ZFMK ( Ar 13006 ), Mt. Hibok Hibok (9.196° N, 124.692° E), 600 m a.s.l., on leaves , 18 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, P.N. Banaag) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, 2 juvs in pure ethanol, in ZFMK ( Phi 241 ), same data GoogleMaps . Bohol Island: 2 ƋƋ, 5 ♀♀ in ZFMK ( Ar 13007 ), near Loboc , above Loboc River (~ 9.655° N, 124.015° E), ~ 250 m a.s.l., forest near caves , 5 Mar. 2014 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, 3 juvs in pure ethanol, in ZFMK ( Phi 199 ), same data GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀ with 8 hymenopteran parasites and 2 juveniles emerged from same egg sac, in pure ethanol in ZFMK ( Phi 291 ), same data ( Fig. 8 View Figs 2 – 15 ) GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, 4 ♀♀, 1 juv. in ZFMK ( Ar 13008 ), Rajah Sikatuna ( Magsaysay Park ) (9.705° N, 124.123° E), 430 m a.s.l., forest , on leaves , 6 Mar. 2014 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps ; 4 juvs in pure ethanol in ZFMK ( Phi 194 ), same data GoogleMaps ; 5 ƋƋ, 11 ♀♀, 34 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 15064 ) GoogleMaps and 2 ƋƋ, 2 ♀♀ in MSU-IIT, Bilar, Barangay Riverside (~ 9.705° N, 12.125° E), 15 Jun. 2015 (M.R.B. Dacar) GoogleMaps .
Assigned tentatively
PHILIPPINES, Bohol Island: 2 ƋƋ, 4 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 15065 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ in MSU-IIT, Garcia Hernandez , Barangay Datag (~ 9.719°N, 124.262°E), 8 Jun. 2015 (M.R.B. Dacar) GoogleMaps ; 3 ƋƋ, 4 ♀♀, 4 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 15066 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, Valencia , Barangay Marawis (9.723°N, 124.202°E), 10–11 Jun. 2015 (M.B.R. Dacar) GoogleMaps ; 2 ƋƋ, 8 ♀♀, 5 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 15067 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, Sierra Bullones , Barangay Nan-od (~ 9.748°N, 124.264°E), 4–5 Jun. 2015 (M.R.B. Dacar) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 5.0, carapace width 1.0. Leg 1: 43.2 (9.8 + 0.5 + 9.9 + 21.1 + 1.9), tibia 2: 6.1, tibia 3: 3.1, tibia 4: 5.0; tibia 1 L/d: 103. Distance PME–PME 355 µm, diameter PME 125 µm, distance PME–ALE ~35 µm; with tiny AME lenses barely visible in dissecting microscope, diameter ~10 µm ( Fig. 45 View Figs 45 – 49 ).
COLOR. Carapace pale ochre with darker triangular mark posteriorly, pair of dark marks lateral of base of eye stalks, and median mark in AME area; clypeus without pattern; sternum whitish; legs ochre-yellow with dark brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen pale gray, with black marks dorsally, monochromous ventrally.
BODY. Habitus as in Figs 9–10 View Figs 2 – 15 ; ocular area raised, triads on long additional stalks with further distal processes whose contiguous tips seem to form a functional unit ( Figs 35 View Figs 35 – 37 , 45, 48–49 View Figs 45 – 49 ); without process between eye stalks; carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodiFed; sternum wider than long (0.70/0.50), unmodiFed.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 47 View Figs 45 – 49 , with pair of curved, weakly sclerotized lateral processes, proximally densely covered with small scales; without modiFed hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Figs 38–39 View Figs 38 – 44 , 50–51 View Figs 50 – 58 ; proximal segments symmetric in shape and apparently also in size ( Figs 53–54 View Figs 50 – 58 ); coxa with strong ventro-distal rim but otherwise unmodiFed; trochanter with distinctive pair of apophyses (retrolateral and dorsal; Figs 53, 54 View Figs 50 – 58 ); femur with weakly sclerotized retrolateral process directed toward dorsal and short ventral process directed toward proximal ( Figs 53, 54 View Figs 50 – 58 ); patella very small; tibia large; tarsus with long whitish elongation; procursi of left and right palps slightly but clearly different, distal part of procursus hinged in left palp, not hinged in right palp ( Figs 41–44 View Figs 38 – 44 ); bulb symmetric in shape, with long processes extending in opposite directions (dorsal embolus; ventral appendix), apparently slightly longer in left palp.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with> 20 pseudosegments, only distally fairly distinct.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in 11 other males: 8.6–10.1 (mean 9.5). Males from the three eastern sites on Bohol Island (Datag, Marawis, Nan-od) differ slightly but consistently from other specimens in the tip of the right procursus that has a distinct retrolateral process. Specimens from these localities are therefore assigned tentatively.
Female
In general similar to male but eye triads on low humps and much closer together (distance PME–PME 260 µm), without AME remnants ( Fig. 46 View Figs 45 – 49 ); posterior mark on carapace smaller, often medially divided; dark abdomen spots in some specimens very indistinct or even absent. Tibia 1 in 32 females: 6.4–8.2 (mean 7.1). Epigynum apparently symmetric, mostly weakly sclerotized, with strong internal transversal sclerite visible through cuticle; extensible scape with strong transversal folds, laterally light brown to orange, with small median process at tip ( Figs 36 View Figs 35 – 37 , 61 View Figs 59 – 63 ); internal genitalia as in Fig. 37 View Figs 35 – 37 , also apparently symmetric.
Natural history
The spiders were found on the undersides of large leaves to which they attach fairly dense but barely visible sheets of silk. One female was collected on 5 Mar. 2014 with a parasitized egg sac from which all eggs hatched on 12 Mar. 2014 (two spiders and eight wasps).
Distribution
Known from Camiguin and Bohol Islands ( Fig. 16 View Fig. 16 ).
ZFMK |
Germany, Bonn, Zoologische Forschungsinstitut und Museum "Alexander Koenig" |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.