Ficus pumila var. ellipsoidea W.C.Cheng
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5825593 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617-414C-DF0A-DEE9-4B43FB214968 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ficus pumila var. ellipsoidea W.C.Cheng |
status |
|
Ficus pumila var. ellipsoidea W.C.Cheng View in CoL in Cheng & Chien (1934: 254).
Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Pingyang, Nan Yan Dang, Xian Gu Dong, 15 July 1934, S. Chen 3564 ( PE00023071 , lectotype designated by Lin et al. 2008a; isolectotypes IBSC0373559 About IBSC , NAS00070407 About NAS , PE00023071 , PE00734086 ) . One of the remaining syntypes: CHINA. Zhejiang: Pingyang, 4 August 1932, Y. Y. Ho 1528 ( CQNM0001154 About CQNM , NAS00070406 About NAS , PE00023070 , PE00734085 ).
Note: —This variety was neglected in the account of Ficus in Chinese floras (e.g. Chang et al. 1998, Zhou & Gilbert 2003), and Lin et al (2008a) did not mention its identity either when lectotypifying this name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |