Rhopalurus caribensis Teruel and Roncallo, 2008

Lauren A. Esposito, Humberto Y. Yamaguti, Cláudio A. Souza, Ricardo Pinto-Da-Rocha & Lorenzo Prendini, 2017, Systematic Revision of the Neotropical Club-Tailed Scorpions, Physoctonus, Rhopalurus, and Troglorhopalurus, Revalidation of Heteroctenus, and Descriptions of Two New Genera and Three New Species (Buthidae: Rhopalurusinae), Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 415, pp. 1-134 : 103-108

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090-415.1.1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4610700
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F65ED57-FFAD-B138-380B-CF96B1216B4A
treatment provided by	Admin
scientific name	Rhopalurus caribensis Teruel and Roncallo, 2008
status

Treatment

Rhopalurus caribensis Teruel and Roncallo, 2008 View in CoL

Figures 6 View FIG , 16 View FIG. 16 C View FIG , 20C View FIG , 21H View FIG , 22H View FIG , 24N–R View FIG , 52A View FIG , 53A View FIG , 54A View FIG , 55A View FIG , 56A View FIG , 57 View FIG

Rhopalurus laticauda: Lourenço, 1982 a: 107 View in CoL , 108, 113, 115, 133–138, figs. 12, 13, 78, table 1 View TABLE 1 (misidentification: specimens from Magdalena); 1991a: 282; fig. 5 (misidentification: specimens from Magdalena); Flórez, 2001: 28 (misidentification: records from Magdalena and La Guajira); Botero-Trujillo and Fagua, 2007: 129–131, 133, figs. 4–6 (misidentification: specimen from Atlántico and records from Magdalena and La Guajira; Teruel and Roncallo, 2007: 6 (misidentification: record from La Guajira); Flórez, 2012 (part): 1, 2, figs. 1, 2, table 1 View TABLE 1 .

Rhopalurus caribensis Teruel and Roncallo, 2008: 3–11 View in CoL , figs. 1–7, tables 1 View TABLE 1 , 2 View TABLE 2 ; Lourenço, 2008: 5, 7, fig. 4; Prendini et al., 2009: 222, 223; Teruel and Roncallo, 2010: 2–4, 11, figs. 2, 11 (part), table 1 View TABLE 1 ; 2013: 112, 113, tables 1 View TABLE 1 , 2 View TABLE 2 ; Teruel and Cozijn, 2013: 2.

TYPE MATERIAL: COLOMBIA: La Guajira Dept.: Holotype ♂ (RTO Sco.0358), Riohacha, Barrio “Adelaida,” 18.xii.2006, C.A. Roncallo. Paratypes: 2 ♂, 1 ♀, 1 juv. ♂ (RTO Sco.0359), Riohacha, Colegio “Sagrado Corazón,” km 1 via Maicao, 27.xi.2006, C.A. Roncallo; 1 ♀, 1 juv. ♂ (RTO Sco.0373), Serranía de Macuira, 3 km W of Nazareth, 14.vii.2007, J. Echavarría.

DIAGNOSIS: Rhopalurus caribensis is most closely related to R. ochoai , sp. nov. It resembles R. ochoai and typical populations of R. laticauda from the northwestern part of the distribution in its predominantly pale yellow-tan color, with light infuscation on the carapace and mesosoma, and metasoma V and telson slightly darker than the preceding segments. However, R. caribensis can be consistently differentiated from R. laticauda and R. ochoai by the color pattern on the ventral surface of the metasoma. Whereas R. caribensis displays three distinct, narrow stripes (a ventromedian stripe flanked on either side by a ventrosubmedian stripe) of pigmentation along the ventral surface, all three stripes are fused into a single, broad band of pigmentation (more pronounced in populations from the southeast of the distribution) in R. laticauda , and only two narrow ventrosubmedian stripes are present in R. ochoai . As with R. ochoai , R. caribensis differs further from populations of R. laticauda occurring in the southeastern part of the distribution (previously referable to R. amazonicus ) in the considerably paler mesosoma, metasoma V, and telson. Additionally, the subaculear tubercle of the telson is vestigial in R. caribensis , small and blunt in R. laticauda , and subspinoid in R. ochoai .

ECOLOGY: Specimens for which data are available were collected with UV light detection at night in dry forest. The habitat and habitus are consistent with the lapidicolous ecomorphotype ( Prendini, 2001 b).

DISTRIBUTION: This species appears to be endemic to the Llanos of the Magdalena, Colombia, separated from the nearest populations of R. laticauda and R. ochoai , sp. nov., by the Cordillera de Perijá (fig. 6). The known locality records occur in the Colombian departments of Atlántico, La Guajira, and Magdalena. Material reported from the Venezuelan state of Zulia ( Rojas-Runjaic and Becerra, 2008; Teruel and Roncallo, 2008, 2010) is referable to R. ochoai .

REMARKS: The status of R. caribensis has been the subject of controversy. Lourenço (2008) suggested it is a morph of R. laticauda and might be more appropriately recognized as a subspecies thereof. Flórez (2012) synonymized R. caribensis with R. laticauda based in part on images of Tityus alleged to be R. caribensis . Teruel and Roncallo (2013) subsequently revalidated R. caribensis . The analyses by Esposito et al. (in review) supported the validity of R. caribensis based on genetic divergence from R. laticauda (fig. 13). The two species are also morphologically diagnosable based on the character combinations described above.

MATERIAL EXAMINED: COLOMBIA: Magdalena Dept.: Município Santa Marta: Bahía de Guairaca, Tayrona Park, 31.x.1985, H.-G. Muller, 1 ♀ (SMF 37027); Corregimiento de Bonda, Vereda Girocasaca, Finca Guaipi, 11°13′0 5.5″N 74°06′14.3″W, 173 m, 21–24.viii.2014, J.A. Moreno and W. Galvis, nocturnal, manual collection with UV light, 1 ♂ (AMCC [LP 13167]), 1 subad. ♂ (AMNH); Finca Las Delicias, 80 m, 17.v.2008, J.A. Noriega, 1 ♂ (AMCC [LP 9341]); Pozo Colorado, 11 km W Santa Marta, 18–30. iv.1968, B. Malkin, 1 ♀, 1 subad., 19 1 st instars (AMNH); Puente de Los Clavos, 15 km E Pueblo Bello, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, 1500 m, 13.vi.1968, B. Malkin, 1 subad. ♂ (AMNH); Santa Marta, 29.vi–31.vii.1966, 2 ♀ (SMF 39120).