Barretthydrus Lea, 1927
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-72.4.639 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5195391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F69AC09-C709-FF90-D113-FDC5CD381311 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Barretthydrus Lea, 1927 |
status |
|
Barretthydrus Lea, 1927 View in CoL
( Figs. 1–19 View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs )
Diagnosis. Instar III of Barretthydrus can be distinguished from those of other genera of Australian Hydroporini that have been well studied (i.e., Antiporus and Paroster ) by the following combination of characters: HL = 1.24–1.36 mm; HL/HW <1.40; nasale broad, subtriangular, not spatulate apically ( Figs. 1 View Figs , 15–16 View Figs ); parietals constricted at level of occipital suture ( Figs. 15–16 View Figs ); primary seta FR7 hair-like ( Fig. 1 View Figs ); A4/A3>0.30; labial palpus composed of two palpomeres ( Figs. 5–6 View Figs ); prementum lacking spinulae along lateral margins ( Figs. 5–6 View Figs ); L3/HW <3.50; primary seta FE7 present ( Fig. 8 View Figs ); natatory setae present on dorsal margin of femora, tibiae, and tarsi ( Fig. 18 View Figs ); U1/ U2’ <3.50; U1/HW <1.70.
Instar I
( Figs. 1–12 View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs )
Description. Body: Subcylindrical, narrowing towards abdominal apex. Measurements and ratios that characterize the body shape are shown in Table 1 View Table 1 . Head: Head capsule ( Figs. 1–2 View Figs ) pearshaped, tapering posteriorly, not constricted at level of occipital suture; ecdysial suture welldeveloped, coronal suture short; frontoclypeus elongate, bluntly rounded, subtriangular with welldeveloped lateral branches, anteroventral margin with 12 ventral lamellae clypeales (Bertrand 1972); dorsal surface with 2 spine-like egg bursters (ruptor ovi of Bertrand 1972) at about mid-length; ocularium present, stemmata not visible ventrally and subdivided into 2 vertical series; epicranial plates meeting ventrally; tentorial pits visible medioventrally at about mid-length. Antenna ( Figs. 3–4 View Figs ) elongate, slightly shorter than HW; composed of 4 antennomeres, A2 and A3 longest, A1 shortest; A3’ relatively elongate, shorter than A4; A3 lacking ventroapical spinula. Mandible ( Fig. 7 View Figs ) prominent, falciform, distal half projecting inwards and upwards, apex sharp; mandibular channel present. Labium ( Figs. 5–6 View Figs ), prementum subrectangular, about as long as broad, lacking lateral marginal spinulae; LP elongate, distinctly shorter than MP, composed of 2 palpomeres; LP2 subfusiform, distinctly longer than LP1. Maxilla ( Figs. 13–14 View Figs ) with short, thick stipes, incompletely sclerotized ventrally; cardo fused to stipes; galea and lacinia absent; MP elongate, slightly shorter than antenna, composed of 3 palpomeres; MP1 and MP2 longest, MP2 distinctly longer than MP1. Thorax: Thoracic terga convex, pronotum slightly shorter than meso- and metanota combined, meso- and metanota subequal; protergite subrectangular to subovate, more developed than meso- and metatergites; [We were unable to determine the presence of an anterotransverse carina owing to the bad condition of the only specimen available.]; thoracic sterna membranous; spiracles absent. Legs: Long ( Figs. 8–9 View Figs ), composed of 6 articles (sensu Lawrence 1991); L1 shortest, L3 longest; CO robust, elongate, TR divided into 2 parts by an annulus, FE, TI, and TA slender, subcylindrical, PTwith 2 long, slender, slightly curved claws; posterior claw shorter than anterior claw on L1 and L2, posterior claw longer than anterior claw on L3; femora, tibiae, and tarsi lacking spinulae along ventral margin. Abdomen: Eight-segmented ( Figs 10–11 View Figs ); segments I–VI sclerotized dorsally, membranous ventrally; segment VII sclerotized both dorsally and ventrally, ventral sclerite independent from dorsal one; tergites I–VII narrow, transverse, rounded laterally, lacking sagittal line; [We were unable to determine the presence of an anterotransverse carina owing to the bad condition of the only specimen available.]; segment VIII (=LAS) longest, completely sclerotized, ring-like, strongly constricted at point of insertion of urogomphus; projecting backwards into a very short, subconical siphon; spiracles absent lateroventrally on segments I–VII. Urogomphus very long, composed of 2 urogomphomeres; U1 long, much longer than segment VIII; U2 narrower, setiform, much shorter than U1. Chaetotaxy: Similar to that of generalized Hydroporinae larva (Alarie and Harper 1990; Alarie et al. 1990; Alarie 1991; Alarie and Michat 2007 a) except for the following features ( Figs. 1–12 View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs ): Pores PAd and ANf absent; pore ANh distal; setae MX 4 and TR2 absent; pore FEa articulated distally, close to seta FE5; seta TI7 short, spine-like; seta AB10 spine-like; setae UR2 and UR3 contiguous, seta UR4 articulated posteriorly; setae UR5, UR6, and UR7 elongate; seta UR8 inserted subapically. [Pore PAk and seta PA13 could not be located. We are reluctant to consider them as lacking due to the condition of the only instar I specimen available.]
Instar II
No specimens were available for study.
Instar III
( Figs. 13–19 View Figs View Figs View Figs )
Description. As instar I except as follows: Body: Measurements and ratios that characterize the body shape in Tables 1 View Table 1 and 2 View Table 2 . Head: Head capsule ( Figs. 15–16 View Figs ) constricted at level of occipital suture; egg bursters lacking. Antenna elongate, distinctly shorter than HW. LP2 subequal to slightly shorter than LP1. MP subequal in length to antenna, MP1 slightly shorter than MP2 ( Figs. 13–14 View Figs ). Thorax: Protergum lacking anterotransverse carina; both meso- and metathoracic terga with an anterotransverse carinae; sagittal line visible; mesopleural region with a spiracular opening on each side. Legs: Position and number of secondary setae in Table 3 View Table 3 ; natatory setae present on dorsal margin of femora, tibiae, and tarsi ( Figs. 17–18 View Figs ). Abdomen: Segment VII completely sclerotized both dorsally and ventrally, all tergites with anterotransverse carina ( Fig. 19 View Figs ); mesopleural region of segments I–VII with a spiracular opening on each side. Chaetotaxy: Head capsule with numerous secondary setae; lateroventral margin of PA with several secondary spine-like setae ( Figs. 15–16 View Figs ); anteroventral margin of nasale with half circle of about 60 lamellae clypeales of different lengths, directed downwards; AN, MX, and LA lacking secondary setae; MN with 1 hair-like secondary seta on basoexternal margin; thoracic and abdominal sclerites I–VIII with numerous secondary setae mainly on posterior half; natatory setae present on dorsal margin of femora, tibiae, and tarsi; secondary leg setation in Tables 3-4 View Table 3 View Table 4 and Figs. 17–18 View Figs ; U with secondary setae ( Fig. 19 View Figs ).
Remarks. Larvae of Barrethydrus can readily be distinguished from those of other Australian Hydroporini described in detail (i.e., Paroster and Antiporus ) by the presence of natatory setae on the dorsal margins of the femur, tibia, and tarsi and metric characters presented in Table 2 View Table 2 , and, superficially, from the less well-studied genera by the strong, dark yellow banding on the body.
Distribution. Endemic to Australia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hydroporinae |
Tribe |
Hydroporini |
SubTribe |
Sternopriscina |