Paraceto spiralis, Zhang, Feng, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4320.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B508944-C73A-49C4-8Ebc-F9Da65Aab583 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6029515 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/901A1147-0A2C-9852-FF6B-FDFA4D15BBF5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paraceto spiralis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paraceto spiralis View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 6–9 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9
Type material. Holotype: ♂, CHINA: Sichuan Province: Shimian County, Liziping National Nature Reserve, near the Zimaping Forest Management Station (28.985647°N, 102.278266°E), 1872m a.s.l., 27 July 2016, leg. Chi Jin and Xiangbo Guo ( MHBU) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1♀ 12♂, same data as holotype ( MHBU) GoogleMaps ; 3♂, same data as holotype but 28 July 2016 ( MHBU) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin spiralis . It refers to the spiralling copulatory duct.
Diagnosis. The new species closely resembles P. orientalis comb. n. in having a similar coiled embolus, along with the elongate coiled cymbium, large patellar apophysis of the male palp and a similar internal duct system of the female vulva, but can be distinguished from it by: 1) the embolus coiled only once, whereas it is coiled twice in P. orientalis comb. n.; 2) the cymbium without a triangular apophysis at its base dorsally, while present in the latter species; 3) the epigynal plate as wide as long, whereas it is obviously wider than long in P. orientalis comb. n.; 4) the position of the copulatory openings is more anterior than that of the latter species; 5) the ST2 are pear-shaped, whereas they are oval in P. orientalis comb. n..
Description. Male. Total length 4.23–4.70 (n = 15). Holotype: body 4.70 long; carapace 2.15 long, 1.90 wide; abdomen 2.55 long, 1.94 wide ( Figs. 6A–B View FIGURE 6 ). Body entirely covered with numerous long, slender pale grey hairs. Carapace dark brown, ovoid in dorsal view, convex, highest between fovea and PER, densely covered with tiny granulations ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). CRW 1.29, 0.68 times carapace width. Fovea black, distinct.
AER and PER slightly recurved in dorsal view ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 ). Eye diameters: AME 0.13, ALE 0.15, PME 0.14, PLE 0.14. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.11, AME–ALE 0.03, PME–PME 0.21, PME–PLE 0.15, ALE–PLE 0.10. MOA 0.30 long, anterior width 0.37, posterior width 0.47. PERW 0.90, 0.70 times CRW. Clypeus height 0.16, wider than diameter of AME. Chilum triangular, sclerotised and brown, with median indentation ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ).
Chelicerae ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ) dark brown, covered with granulations carrying hairs similar to carapace, cheliceral boss pronounced; with three promarginal and two retromarginal teeth. Endites ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ) light yellow-brown, apex obtuse angle shape; labium brown, slightly wider than long. Sternum ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ) yellow-brown, shield-shaped, with sharp precoxal triangles and blunt intercoxal sclerites.
Anterior legs ( Figs 8A–B View FIGURE 8 ) yellow-brown and posterior legs ( Figs. 8E–F View FIGURE 8 ) light yellow-brown; short, black ventral leg cusps present on tarsi and metatarsi I–II, arranged sparsely in two lines ( Figs 8C–D View FIGURE 8 ). Measurements of legs: leg I 6.03 (1.84, 0.77, 1.56, 1.14, 0.72), II 5.87 (1.76, 0.73, 1.48, 1.18, 0.72), III 4.24 (1.24, 0.58, 0.89, 1.02, 0.51), IV 5.68 (1.62, 0.63, 1.37, 1.50, 0.56). Leg formula: 1243. Abdomen oval, yellowish pink, with several indistinct pale grey chevrons posteriorly and two pairs of sigilla medially; dorsal scutum absent ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Venter yellowish-pink, with two narrow lines of sclerotized spots ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ).
Palp as illustrated ( Figs 9A–E View FIGURE 9 , 10A–C View FIGURE 10 ). Femur with a small, shallow ventral terminal groove (VFG); patella with large blunt apophysis, pointed retrolaterally. Tibia with one large hook-shaped apophysis retrolaterally, with sharp tip pointed anteriorly. Tegulum pear-shaped, basally rounded, sperm duct invisible in dorsal view, with one apical and one prolaterally apophyses; subtegulum nearly invisible in dorsal view. Embolus well-developed, slender, originating prolaterally, coiled in large circle retrolaterally. Cymbium posteriorly expanded and anteriorly developed, anti-clockwise coiled to tapering tip (left palp in retrolateral view), with long cymbial furrow along with embolus.
Female ( Figs 6C–D View FIGURE 6 ). Total length 4.40. Carapace 2.02 long, 1.79 wide; abdomen 2.38 long, 1.83 wide. CRW 1.13, 0.63 times carapace width. Eye diameters: AME 0.13, ALE 0.14, PME 0.14, PLE 0.14. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.11, AME–ALE 0.04, PME–PME 0.19, PME–PLE 0.16, ALE–PLE 0.11. MOA 0.32 long, anterior width 0.35, posterior width 0.41. PERW 0.83, 0.73 times CRW. Clypeus height 0.14, slightly wider than diameter of AME. Chilum visible in ante-ventral view ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ). Leg measurements: I lost; II 5.36 (1.65, 0.73, 1.26, 1.03, 0.69); III 4.13 (1.25, 0.59, 0.83, 0.99, 0.47); IV 5.83 (1.65, 0.68, 1.39, 1.54, 0.57). Leg formula: -4-23. Legs without cusps ( Figs 8G–I View FIGURE 8 ). Body colour much lighter than that of male, because it had recently moulted prior to being collected. Other characters as in male.
Epigyne ( Figs 9F View FIGURE 9 , 10D View FIGURE 10 ): epigynal plate as wide as long, weakly sclerotized; copulatory openings situated laterally, large and oval, posterior edge of copulatory openings substantially at same level as posterior edge of ST2; hood absent. Vulva ( Figs 9G View FIGURE 9 , 10E–F View FIGURE 10 ): copulatory ducts long, anteriorly thick and posteriorly slender, coiled three times before attached to ST2; ST2 large, pear-shaped, close to each other; connecting ducts slender, coiling around anterior part of copulatory ducts; ST1 spherical, connected to basally weakly sclerotized FD.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |