Pseudobiceros pardalis ( Verrill 1900 )

Bahia, Juliana, Padula, Vinicius, Lavrado, Helena Passeri & Quiroga, Sigmer, 2014, Taxonomy of Cotylea (Platyhelminthes: Polycladida) from Cabo Frio, southeastern Brazil, with the description of a new species, Zootaxa 3873 (5), pp. 495-525 : 506-509

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3873.5.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:687DC4E0-9B78-4AF0-9DD2-8B868E3B8EB5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6143920

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/927D87F1-FFC1-3216-FF78-7EC16E67FE02

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pseudobiceros pardalis ( Verrill 1900 )
status

 

Pseudobiceros pardalis ( Verrill 1900) View in CoL

( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 )

Material examined. One specimen (MNRJ-PLAT 33, 55 x 37 mm) as sagittal sections of reproductive structures (24 slides) collected 16.10.2009 at Praia das Conchas, Cabo Frio, Brazil (22°52'33.05"S, 41°58'39.27"W). One specimen in ethanol 70% (MNRJ-PLAT 34, 64 x 36 mm). Collected 17.10.2009 at Paredão Sul, Ilha do Papagaio, Cabo Frio, Brazil (22°54'3.28"S, 41°59'1.21"W).

Distribution. Pseudobiceros pardalis was described from Bermuda ( Verrill 1900) and reported from Bahamas, south Florida and Panama ( Bolaños et al. 2007). It is herein reported for the first time from Brazil. This record expands the species distribution to a transition/limit zone between tropical (Tropical Southwestern Atlantic and Subtropical Southwestern Atlantic Provinces) and subtropical environments ( Spalding et al. 2007).

Diagnosis. Purple reddish dorsal surface with orange dots, delimited by black line; white dots also delimited by black line near the margin and body margin also with black surrounding line. Ventrally same pattern, light reddish purple, translucent above the reproductive organs and pharynx.

Taxonomic remarks. Our specimens are in agreement with the original description and the re-description ( Bolaños et al. 2007). We only disagree on the type of pseudotentacles that are formed by complex folds of the anterior margin, not simple folds as stated in the redescription. Our specimens have lighter coloration than the ones in the original description ( Verrill 1900) and redescription ( Bolaños et al. 2007), probably due to their larger size or to differences in the nutritional conditions of the animals. In the field, specimens were darker, as illustrated in Figure 10 View FIGURE 10 . We also noted a black line surrounding the margin. Observed differences in coloration as reported in other papers can occur due to different specimen size (60 x 40 mm in the original description, from 25 x 14 mm to 40 x 25 mm in Bolaños et al. (2007) and 55 x 37 mm – 64 x 36 mm in our specimens).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF