Iridopelma plantaris (C. L. Koch, 1842), comb. n., nomen dubium
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.659.10717 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:79A6393D-8021-41B8-BF1A-2A3723AFECFB |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/928E4089-F2FE-D2F2-D12D-9F29738A9FB7 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Iridopelma plantaris (C. L. Koch, 1842), comb. n., nomen dubium |
status |
|
Iridopelma plantaris (C. L. Koch, 1842), comb. n., nomen dubium Fig. 220
Mygale plantaris C. L. Koch, 1842; 71 tab. CCCXII, fig. 736 (syntypes 2 immatures, Brazil, ZMB 2026, examined). Syn. n.
Eurypelma plantaris : C. L. Koch 1850: 74.
Avicularia plantaris : Simon 1892: 172; World Spider Catalog 2016.
Remarks.
C. L. Koch (1842) published the description of Mygale plantaris in the same year of Mygale leporina . As Mygale leporina , the procurve anterior row of eyes, the digitiform posterior article of spinnerets, the color pattern and type locality (Brazil) of the syntypes match with Iridopelma (Fig. 220). Therefore, we transfer Mygale plantaris to Iridopelma , making the new combination Iridopelma plantaris (C. L. Koch, 1842) comb. n. Like Mygale leporina , the syntypes of Mygale plantaris are immature specimens. Iridopelma species present very intense ontogenetic changes in color pattern, thus different life stages present very distinct abdominal color pattern. This could be the reason why C. L. Koch (1842) described both forms as two different species when they could be the same. As we can’t assuredly affirm they are the same species, since the types are not adults or even in good condition, we decided to keep them as separate species and to consider Iridopelma plantaris (C. L. Koch, 1842) comb. n. nomen dubium.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |