Metopa robusta Sars, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2465.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/931B5117-FB17-6669-FF26-AAA8FD79BE5F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Metopa robusta Sars, 1892 |
status |
|
Metopa robusta Sars, 1892 View in CoL
Metopa robusta Sars 1892: 270–72 View in CoL , pl. 96-1
Metopa robusta View in CoL — Reibisch 1905: 177
Metopa robusta View in CoL — Stephensen 1925: 5; Stephensen 1926: 68; Stephensen 1928: 168–70, fig. 32:1–6; Stephensen 1931: 180; Stephensen 1938: 168;
Metopa robusta View in CoL — Gurjanova 1951: 417–420, fig. 258; Shoemaker 1955: 22
Material examined. Morphological examination: F13717 (coll: G.O.Sars, Bejan, Trondheimfjord) female. Syntype .
Photo: F13717, syntype .
Type locality: Trondheimsfjord (at Bejan), Norway .
See figures 51, 52, 53, 54 and 55.
Morphological redescription of female type material.
Head ( Figs. 51 View FIGURE 51 and 52 View FIGURE 52 ): small and somewhat tapering; eyes small and round. Antenna 1 ( Fig. 52 View FIGURE 52 ): subequal to antenna 2; peduncle shorter than flagellum, article 1 as long as articles 2 and 3 together; flagellum with 16 articles, each with a minute seta; no accessory flagellum observed. Antenna 2 ( Fig. 52 View FIGURE 52 ): peduncle more than twice as long as flagellum, articles 4 and 5 subequal; flagellum with nine articles. Mandible ( Fig. 52 View FIGURE 52 ): palp 3-articulate, with several simple setae along article 2 and one simple seta at tip of article 3; incisor and lacinia mobilis serrate; raker setae thick; no molar. Maxilla 1 ( Fig. 52 View FIGURE 52 ): inner lobe small and rounded; outer lobe flat at distal margin, one tooth, four cuspidate setae and a line of simple setae along inner margin; palp 1-articulate, a tooth at distal margin, serrate inner margin with simple setae in each nook of the serrations, outer margin with very thin simple setae. Maxilla 2 ( Fig. 52 View FIGURE 52 ): outer plate in normal position to inner plate; inner plate with seven and outer plate with 10 simple setae. Maxilliped ( Fig. 52 View FIGURE 52 ): long and slender; inner plates fully separate, a single simple seta at distal margin; outer plates very small; 0.2x palp article 1 length, one simple seta at tip; palp 4-articulate, lined with simple setae along inner margins, article 3 cushioned at inner distal margin with short simple setae, and a type A seta at tip, article 4 lined with short simple setae at inner margin.
Pereon ( Fig. 51 View FIGURE 51 ): smooth. Pereopod 1 ( Fig. 53 View FIGURE 53 ): simple; coxa small and subquadrate; basis strong and linear, several simple setae along anterior margin; ischium subquadrate; merus short, almost round, distally free, posterior margin cushioned with very short simple setae, distal margin with several long simple setae; carpus elongate and slim, posterior margin with simple setae; propodus thin and elongate, shorter than carpus, no palm but several simple setae at posterodistal margin; dactylus boat-shaped, lined with short simple setae along ridge, length 1.5x width, depth 0.5x width. Pereopod 2 ( Fig. 53 View FIGURE 53 ): coxa suboval, directed forwards, covering coxa 1, five simple setae at posterior margin; basis straight, anterior margin flat with s few short simple setae; ischium subquadrate; merus triangular, posterodistal margin with long simple setae; carpus short and wide, posterodistal margin with long simple setae; propodus subrectangular, palm almost transverse, smooth with simple setae, palmar corner with small notch and strong tooth, hind margin 2x palm length; dactylus strong and curved, smooth. Pereopod 3 ( Fig. 53 View FIGURE 53 ): coxa subrectangular, five simple setae at posterior margin; rest of leg thin and simple, basis with many simple setae along anterior margin; meral lobe less than 0.1x carpal length; dactylus very thin and long, 0.8x propodus length, almost straight. Pereopod 4 ( Fig. 54 View FIGURE 54 ): coxa triangular, wide, distal margin sinuate; rest of leg simple, broader than P3; meral lobe 0.3x carpal length; dactylus strong, inner margin serrate with a notch at tip, slightly curved. Pereopod 5 ( Fig. 54 View FIGURE 54 ): coxa small, posteriorly slightly extended; basis slim, linear; meral lobe 0.5x carpus length; anterior margin of merus, carpus and propodus lined with pairs of simple setae; dactylus smooth, almost straight, 0.5x propodus length. Pereopods 6 and 7 ( Fig. 55 View FIGURE 55 ): coxae small, coxa 6 extended posterodistally; bases extended posteriorly, rounded; meral lobes 1.1x and 1.4x carpus length respectively; dactyli both 0.5x propodus length, slightly serrate and notched at tip, weakly curved.
Urosome ( Figs. 51 View FIGURE 51 and 55 View FIGURE 55 ): smooth. Epimeral plate 3 ( Fig. 55 View FIGURE 55 ): posterodistal corner acute, with rounded tip. Uropod 1 ( Fig. 55 View FIGURE 55 ): longer than uropod 2; biramous; peduncle longer than rami, inner margin with five simple setae; outer ramus slightly longer than inner ramus, three simple setae. Uropod 2 ( Fig. 54 View FIGURE 54 ): longer than uropod 3; biramous; peduncle longer than rami, few simple setae at inner margin; outer ramus slightly longer than inner ramus, two small setae. Uropod 3 ( Fig. 54 View FIGURE 54 ): uniramous; peduncle subequal in length but wider than ramus, two small simple setae; ramus 2-articulate, inner article longer than outer, one seta at distal margin. Telson ( Fig. 54 View FIGURE 54 ): boat-shaped, with sides curving up, rounded, length 2x width, two pairs of cuspidate setae.
Sexual differences: no sexual differences noted.
Distribution: Norwegian coast (Trondheimfjord to northern Norway), Skagerrak, Scotland, Faroe Islands, West Greenland, Kara Sea, Tschukotsk Sea, Bering Sea, Alaska, see map Figure 68 L View FIGURE 68 .
Ecology: the species is noted by Sars (1892) to have been found among hydroids.
The name robusta refers to the "robust" build of the species, and in particular gnathopod 2.
Remarks. The gnathopod 1 dactylus being boatshaped like that of Metopa palmata suggests that this species, in spite of its 3-articulate mandible palp, also possibly should be removed from Metopa , but as the mouthparts follow the definitions by both Boeck (1872) and Barnard & Karaman (1991), this is not suggested here. It is, however, clear that the phylogenetic placement of this species should be tested, and this will be done in a forthcoming paper (Tandberg & Vader in prep). The peculiar shape of the pereopod 1 dactylus is a character that should be examined further.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Metopa robusta Sars, 1892
Tandberg, Anne Helene S. 2010 |
Metopa robusta
Shoemaker, C. R. 1955: 22 |
Gurjanova, E. F. 1951: 417 |
Metopa robusta
Stephensen, K. 1938: 168 |
Stephensen, K. 1931: 180 |
Stephensen, K. 1928: 168 |
Stephensen, K. 1926: 68 |
Stephensen, K. 1925: 5 |
Metopa robusta
Reibisch, J. 1905: 177 |
Metopa robusta
Sars, G. O. & The Crustacea of Norway 1892: 72 |