Echiniscus aff. brunus, Dey & Gąsiorek & Michalczyk, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad132 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FB8839E-9C7D-4B5D-A35C-BED4249BAF77C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10616588 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9323FE1E-FF8D-D306-FE8F-40D2FF09FA54 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Echiniscus aff. brunus |
status |
|
Echiniscus aff. brunus sp. can. 2
( Fig. 14 View Figure 14 )
Material examined: Four individuals (for details, see Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Shortened description: Except for pore density in the dorsal plates ( Fig. 14A View Figure 14 ), morphotype is identical to that of E. brunus and E. aff. brunus sp. can. 1 ( Fig. 14B–D View Figure 14 ).
In contrast to the two Indian species, cuticular pores in E. aff. brunus sp. can. 2 are more numerous and thus more densely arranged (see Fig. 14A View Figure 14 ). Despite clear genetic differences between E. aff. brunus sp. can. 2 and the two remaining species in the complex, we refrain from describing it as a new species because of the low number of available specimens, which precludes a detailed description of intraspecific morphological variability.
DNA sequences: A set of five markers was obtained: 18S rRNA (OR520120–1), 28S rRNA (OR520114–5), ITS-1 (OR520108–9), ITS-2 (OR520129–30) and COI (OR506708– 9). For p-distances, see the description of E. brunus and the note about E. aff. brunus sp. can. 1 above (see also Supporting Information, SM.03).
Remarks: Found together with E. belloporus , E. tantulus , E. tristis and several species of macrobiotids and milnesiids in the samples.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |