Horismenus butcheri, Hansson, Christer, Aebi, Alexandre & Benrey, Betty, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157587 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507883 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/932D8783-5D65-FFED-AA71-FEF0FB8AAE70 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Horismenus butcheri |
status |
sp. nov. |
Horismenus butcheri View in CoL sp.nov. Hansson & Aebi
Figs 2–7 View FIGURES 2 – 5 View FIGURES 6 – 9 , 20–21 View FIGURES 20 – 29
Diagnosis. Female gaster elongate (MM/LG = 0.8–0.9) ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 6 – 9 ); female funicular segments long ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20 – 29 ), e.g. first funicular segment 3.5X as long as wide; male scape narrow, 4.5X as long as wide ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20 – 29 ).
Description. Length of body female 2.6–2.8 mm, male 2.2–2.6 mm.
Scape yellowishwhite with apical 1/4 metallic bluishgreen; pedicel and flagellum metallic bluishgreen. Frons goldengreen in female, metallic purple in male. Vertex metallic bluishgreen in female, goldengreen with purple tinges in male. Mesosoma metallic bluishgreen with purple tinges to goldengreen, propodeum metallic bluishgreen to goldengreen with sunken and reticulate parts dull goldenpurple. Coxae metallic bluishgreen; femora, tibiae and tarsi yellowishwhite. Wings hyaline. Petiole dull goldenpurple. First gastral tergite metallic bluishgreen in anterior 1/3, dull goldenpurple in posterior 2/3.
Antennae as in Figs 20–21 View FIGURES 20 – 29 . Frons with strong smallmeshed reticulation, reticulation weaker above frontal suture, interscrobal area and clypeal region smooth and shiny; frontal suture Vshaped, terminating before reaching eyes; antennal scrobes join below frontal suture. Vertex with strong, engraved and smallmeshed reticulation; with a median groove in posterior half, groove continues down on occiput. Occipital margin rounded. Ratios of HE/MS/WM female 3.6/1.0/2.3, male 4.3/1.0/2.8; POL/OOL/POO 6.0/1.3/1.0; WH/WT 1.1.
Mesoscutum with strong largemeshed reticulation; notauli indistinct and wide in posterior 1/3. Scutellum with strong and engraved reticulation. Dorsellum smooth, with two large foveas anterolaterally, foveas reticulate. Coxae with weak reticulation. Fore wing speculum open below. Propodeum smooth and shiny, with sunken parts reticulate; propodeal callus with two setae. Petiole 1.1X as long as wide in female, 1.4X as long as wide in male. Ratios of LW/LM/HW 1.8/1.1/1.0; PM/ST 0.9.
First tergite smooth and shiny in anterior 1/3, posterior 2/3 with micropunctures. Ratios of MM/LG female 0.8–0.9, male 1.0–1.1.
Distribution. Mexico, USA (New Mexico).
Hosts. Acanthoscelides sp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Bruchus amicus Horn , both hosts are Bruchidae (Coleoptera) .
Material examined. Holotype female labeled “ Mexico: Est. Mexico, Temascaltepec, 100º02´W, 19º02´N, 1750m, 21.xii.2001 – 2.iii.2002, A. Aebi, ex Acanthoscelides sp. on Phaseolus vulgaris ” (BMNH). Paratypes: 3 females, 4 males with same label data as holotype (BMNH, USNM); 13 females 12 males from same locality as holotype but collected 5.i–20.ii.2003 ( CH, CNIN, MHNN); 2 females, 1 male from same locality as holotype but collected 27.i–21.ii.2001 and from 1700m altitude (CNC); 3 females, 4 males from same locality as holotype but collected 16.xii.2001 – 3.ii.2002 and from 1700m altitude (BMNH, CNC); 5 females, 5 males “ Mexico: Est. Mexico, Valle de Bravo, 100º09´W, 18º56´N, 1950m, 1.i–15.ii.2002, A. Aebi, ex Acanthoscelides sp. on Phaseolus vulgaris ” ( CH, CNC, USNM). Nontype material: a female included in the type material of Horismenus productus (Ashmead) (see below) from Bruchus amicus in New Mexico (USNM) is conspecific with butcheri . This specimen is not included in the type material because it is damaged.
Etymology. This species is named in honour of Dr. Robert D.J. Butcher, for guidance and support throughout the dissertation research of Alexandre Aebi.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |