Philosinidae, Kennedy, 1925

Orr, Albert G. W., 2024, A review of present knowledge of larvae of the Calopterygoidea (Zygoptera) of the Oriental realm, including keys to families and known genera, Zootaxa 5497 (2), pp. 209-243 : 237

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5497.2.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3C66D95-3585-4920-BE93-A44D33FB2FBB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14053295

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/937387AD-E029-D74E-FF79-ECB7FA56FBAE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Philosinidae
status

 

Family Philosinidae View in CoL

This small family ranges from southern China to Indochina, Thailand and much of Sundaland. The larvae of both genera are described ( Needham & Gyger 1939, Lieftinck 1956, Orr 2003, Zhang et al. 2011, Kawashima et al. 2011, Novelo-Gutiérrez et al. 2014), with both species of Philosina , P. alba Wilson and P. buchi Ris , and five of 10 species of Rhinagrion known. Not much interspecific variation is expected in the latter. Distinctive features of the family include: prementum with strongly developed median lobe with deep, apically closed, median cleft ( Figs 22, 23 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ); median caudal gill densely tracheated, slightly ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ) or significantly shorter ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ) and thinner than the lateral caudal lamellae; lateral lamellae fleshy and undulating each with basally expanded midrib armed with spines on outer face. In Rhinagrion , in life the lateral gills form a tube shielding the median lamellae ( Kalkman et al. 2010) and it is believed the same may be true of Philosina ( Zhang et al. 2011) . The same authors claimed that Rhinagrion lack a subocular comb on the gena, present in Philosina , but this was shown to be incorrect by Novelo-Gutiérrez et al. (2014) in R. mima (Karsch) and a comb is also present in R. borneense (Selys) , (Orr, unpublished data). The only consistent differences between the genera appears to be relative leg-length, and the lateral caudal gills are relatively longer in Philosina and distinctly longer than the median one ( Figs 19, 21 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ), whereas the median gill is only slightly shorter than the laterals in Rhinagrion ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ). Also, in Philosina there are three variably developed setae on the anterior labial palp ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ), whereas in published accounts of Rhinagrion , there is only one, but in R. borneense ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ) there are two strong setae (Orr, unpublished data) hence this character is considered unreliable.

Key to genera

1 Legs very long; hind femur reaching abdominal S8–9; lateral caudal gill ovoid elongate, exceeding half length of abdomen; median caudal gill significantly shorter than lateral gills ( Figs 19, 21 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ). Total length excluding caudal gills 14–20 mm ................................................................................................... Philosina [southern China and northern Indochina]

1’ Legs relatively shorter; hind femur reaching abdominal S6; lateral caudal gill squarish, nor exceeding half length of abdomen; median caudal gill slightly shorter than lateral gills ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–26. 18 ). Total length excluding gills 12–14 mm ....... Rhinagrion [Southern China to Thailand and most of Sundaland]

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Odonata

Family

Philosinidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF