Heterosestrum formosum bispinum ( Tochilina, 1972 )

Popova, Irina M., Baumgartner, Peter O., Guex, Jean, Tochilina, Svetlana V. & Glezer, Zoya I., 2002, Radiolarian biostratigraphy of Paleogene deposits of the Russian Platform (Voronesh Anticline), Geodiversitas 24 (1), pp. 7-59 : 35

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5375608

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/965DED24-0E6A-5415-FF15-84BE3924F972

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Heterosestrum formosum bispinum ( Tochilina, 1972 )
status

 

Heterosestrum formosum bispinum ( Tochilina, 1972) emend. ( Fig. 11F View FIG )

Amphicyclia bispina Tochilina, 1972: 134 , pl. 1.

Heterosestrum formosum – Kozlova 1999: pl. 34, fig. 1.

Heterosestrum sp. cf. formosum – Kozlova 1999: pl. 28, fig. 9.

Heterosestrum sp. aff. tschujenkoi – Kozlova 1999: pl. 41, fig. 2.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION. — Voronesh Anticline.

STRATIGRAPHIC RANGE. — Middle Eocene, Kievsky Group, Fedorovskaya Formation, Voronesh Anticline, Pirogovo Village, well 510C, 44.0 m depth.

REMARKS

The quantity of outershell spines and peripheral concentric inner shells (the double medullar shell’s central part has a stable construction) are very changeable characteristics for Heterosestrum formosum . However, in the same sample it was observed abundant amount of specimens bearing only two (or only three to six) polar spines and three to five concentric inner shells. This phenomena can be explained by local environmental conditions of the siliceous microfauna existence. Because of that the latter gave the rise for a different morphotype better adjusted for special life conditions. In order to reflect this local (but very important for age determination) phenomena and to preserve the stratigraphical resolution of this group, we decided not to generalize its systematics, joining under the name Heterosestrum formosum all its possible morphotypes, but to introduce a group of subspecies, where the name of each morphotype was earlier ( Tochilina 1972) described as a different species, because of a difference in quantity of the inner shells and outershell spines. The attribution of Amphicyclia trispina , A. quadrispina and A. pentaspina to H. shabalkini ( Lipman, 1949) by Kozlova (1999) is not correct, as the most characteristic feature of latter – the amplification of the thickness of the shell in its peripheral part (lateral view) – was not observed ( Fig. 10D, G View FIG ), or illusive, when the central part of an outershell is broken ( Fig. 12O View FIG ).

Kingdom

Chromista

Phylum

Retaria

Class

Polycystinea

Order

Spumellaria

Genus

Heterosestrum

Loc

Heterosestrum formosum bispinum ( Tochilina, 1972 )

Popova, Irina M., Baumgartner, Peter O., Guex, Jean, Tochilina, Svetlana V. & Glezer, Zoya I. 2002
2002
Loc

Amphicyclia bispina

TOCHILINA S. V. 1972: 134
1972
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF