Hawaiiandra puncticeps ( Sharp, 1878 ) Santos-Silva & Heffern & Matsuda, 2010

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), Insecta Mundi 2010 (130), pp. 1-120 : 53-54

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5164485

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8400179

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/975887B7-FFED-FFD2-66D0-F8F9171F3196

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hawaiiandra puncticeps ( Sharp, 1878 )
status

comb. nov.

Included species. Hawaiiandra puncticeps ( Sharp, 1878) View in CoL , comb. nov.

Geographical distribution ( Fig. 315 View Figure 315-316 ). Hawaiian Islands.

Comments. Hawaiiandra differs from Birandra , mainly, by the absence of the small tooth at the apex of the latero-outer face of the mandible of the male ( Fig. 75 View Figure 75-89 ), by the mandible of the female ( Fig. 74 View Figure 45-74. 45-73 ) similar to those of Parandra and Archandra , by the short galea ( Fig. 199 View Figure 177-199. 177-195 ), and by the procoxal cavities slightly open behind. In Birandra , the mandibles in both sexes have a small tooth at the apex of the latero-outer face, the mandibles of the female ( Fig. 119 View Figure 118-147 ) are different from that of Parandra ( Fig. 121 View Figure 118-147 ) and Archandra , the galea is long (reaching or surpassing the apex of the second segment of maxillary palp), and the procoxal cavities are clearly open behind.

Hawaiiandra differs from Acutandra , mainly, by the mandibles strongly differentiated between the sexes (sub-equal in Acutandra ). Differs from Parandra , Archandra , Neandra and Stenandra , by the procoxal cavities open behind (closed in the four genera). From Neandra , differs also by the presence of paronychium (absent in Neandra ). From Komiyandra , differs by the mandibles of the major male clearly falciform ( Fig. 123 View Figure 118-147 ), and by the veins MP 3 and MP 4 fused at their apex ( Fig. 209 View Figure 200-209. 200-204 ). In Komiyandra , the mandibles of the major male are sub-falciform ( Fig. 154 View Figure 148-176 ), and the veins MP 3 and MP 4 are not fused at their apex ( Fig. 211 View Figure 210-217. 210-214 ). Differs from Melanesiandra by the absence of the teeth at the apex of the lateroouter face of the mandibles of the major male, by the procoxal cavities slightly open behind, and by the paronychium with two setae. In Melanesiandra , the apex of the latero-outer face of the mandibles in both sexes have small teeth, the procoxal cavities are clearly open behind, and the paronychium has a single seta.

Curiously, Archandra caspia (Ménétriés, 1832) from Asia, and many species of Parandra from America, have a similar general appearance to Hawaiiandra and that species, in turn, has a similar appearance to some species from the Oriental Province, mainly Melanesiandra striatifrons . That seems to contradict the theory of Lameere (1902) that Archandra (which included the species presently placed in Parandra ) is the most primitive group, primarily because the species of Parandrinae are obviously Gondwanan and the Hawaiian Islands are geologically new, besides the isolation of Archandra in relation to Parandra .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Hawaiiandra

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF