Philoctetes horvathi ( Mocsáry, 1889 ), Mocsary, 1889
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4040.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A8FE1D9-AA9F-4EDD-93F7-821954D8B76A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511327 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/984D5315-7926-4224-58AF-FC68FB9AF953 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Philoctetes horvathi ( Mocsáry, 1889 ) |
status |
|
Philoctetes horvathi ( Mocsáry, 1889)
Ellampus wesmaeli Mocsáry, 1882: 27 . Lectotype ♀ (designated by Móczár 1964: 434), Hungary (HNHM) (examined), nom. praeocc., nec Chevrier, 1862.
Ellampus horváthi (!) Mocsáry, 1889: 82. Replacement name for Ellampus wesmaeli Mocsáry, 1882 .
Ellampus horvathii (!): Dalla Torre 1892: 13.
Omalus (Omalus) horvathi: Linsenmaier 1959: 15 , 19; Linsenmaier 1997: 249.
Omalus horváthi (!): Móczár 1964: 434 (lectotype designation).
Philoctetes horvathi: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 256 ; Ha et al. 2008: 77; Rosa et al. 2013: 13; Rosa et al. 2014: 32 View Cited Treatment .
Material examined. HUNGARY: ♀: Deliblat 5.VII. / ♀ / Lectotypus ♀ Ellampus horvathi Mocsáry / id nr. 134866 HNHM Hym. coll. CHINA: 1♀, Nan-Chan le Kan Tchegu à Lan Tcheou [=Lanzhou], 2000 m to 4000 m, VII.1908, Dr. Vaillant 1909 ( NMLS).
Diagnosis. Philoctetes horvathi ( Mocsáry, 1889) is similar to P. mongolicus (du Buysson, 1901) and P. deauratus ( Mocsáry, 1914) for general habitus ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). However, it can be easily separated from P. mongolicus by the following characteristics: metanotum conical to slightly projected backward (with large and flat medial projection with apex U-shaped in P. mongolicus ); males with metanotum conical not projected backward ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 D); apex of T3 with shallow median notch ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 F) (deep in P. mongolicus ); and body with uniform colouration, without black areas ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 A, 1C) (with large black areas on mesosoma and metasoma in P. mongolicus ). It can be separated from P. deauratus by metanotum slightly projected backward and almost as long as the mesoscutellum dorso-medially (not projected and shorter in P. d e au r a t u s); tegula brown without metallic reflection (with red metallic reflection in P. deauratus ); T2 densely punctuate dorsally (with sparse punctuation in P. deauratus ); body colouration metallic red-purple (shining golden-red with greenish reflections on pronotum and mesonotum in P. horvathi ).
Distribution. China (Gansu). Transpalearctic, from Europe and North Africa to Korea ( Kimsey & Bohart 1991; Linsenmaier 1997).
Remarks. Pictures of the type are published in Rosa et al. (2014: Plate 23).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Philoctetes horvathi ( Mocsáry, 1889 )
Rosa, Paolo, Wei, Na-Sen, Notton, David & Xu, Zai-Fu 2015 |
Omalus horváthi
Moczar 1964: 434 |
Omalus (Omalus) horvathi:
Linsenmaier 1997: 249 |
Linsenmaier 1959: 15 |
Ellampus horvathii
Dalla 1892: 13 |
Ellampus horváthi
Mocsary 1889: 82 |
Ellampus wesmaeli Mocsáry, 1882 : 27
Moczar 1964: 434 |
Mocsary 1882: 27 |