Lathropus jamaicensis Thomas, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5352802 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5450607 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/985B2935-6D09-DD22-FF5A-93ABFE42F800 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lathropus jamaicensis Thomas |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lathropus jamaicensis Thomas , n. sp.
Fig. 7 View Figure 5-8 , 13 View Figure 13-18 , 21 View Figure 19-24 , 32 View Figure 27-32 , 39 View Figure 38-40 , 53 View Figure 51-56. 51
Diagnosis. Length, 1.24mm - 1.68mm. This and the following species are distinct in being unicolorous testaceous and in having well-devel- Figure 46. Lathropus vernalis Casey , female genitalia. oped pronotal sublateral lines ( Fig. 21 View Figure 19-24 ). From the following species, L. jamaicensis can be distinguished by its more strongly developed sublateral line and by the structure of the internal sac ( Fig. 39 View Figure 38-40 ).
Description. Holotype, sex not determined, in FSCA, with label data: “ JAMAICA: St. Catherine Caymanas Est. 17-XI-1968 S.A. Apeji blacklight trap”.
Body ( Fig. 7 View Figure 5-8 ) elongate-oval; testaceous, mouthparts paler. Length, 1.58mm.
Head 1.75× wider than long; surface sculpture extremely coarse ( Fig. 13 View Figure 13-18 ); setae bifurcate; epistome prolonged, comprising 0.33 total length of head measured along midline from front of eyes to front of head capsule, emarginate; antennal scape and pedicel subequal in length, scape broad, pedicel narrower; antennomeres III-VIII quadrate, about equal in length; antennomeres IX-X broader and longer than preceding flagellar antennomeres; XI longer than X; eye slightly convex, about 0.60 length of head.
Pronotum ( Fig. 21 View Figure 19-24 ) 1.36× wider than long; surface sculpture extremely coarsely areolate-rugose ( Fig.32 View Figure 27-32 ); setae as on head; broadest at basal third, broader across base than at apex; sublateral line sinuate, strongly carinate ( Fig. 21 View Figure 19-24 ); anterior angles obtuse, not produced; posterior angles almost right, not produced; lateral margins with four broad denticles.
Elytra 1.60× longer than combined width; broadestnear midlength; margins broadly explanate; microsculpture coriarious.
Genitalia. Sclerotization of internal sac of male genitalia as in Fig.39 View Figure 38-40 .
Variation. The degree of development of the lateral pronotal denticles varies but is always discernible.
Distribution. Jamaica.
Type material. Paratypes,33, with label data as follows: 23, “ JAMAICA: St. Andrew, Kingston, Liguanea Terrace Hotel , 29-X-1968 M.H. Muma, blacklight trap ” ; 5, “ JAMAICA: Parrish St. Catherine Worthy Park Est. 11-VI-1975 R. E. Woodruff blacklight trap ” ; 1, “ JAMAICA: St. Catherine Par., Worthy Park 15- VI-1975 R. E. Woodruff blacklight trap ” ; 7, “ JAMAICA: St. Catherine Caymanas Est. , 17-XI-1968, S.A. Apeji blacklight trap ” ; 4, “ JAMAICA: Manchester Par. Mandeville 23-VIII-1969 J.H. Frank blacklight trap ” ; all FSCA and USNM.
Etymology. Named for the island on which it was collected and to which it may be endemic.
Discussion. This is one of the most distinct species of ther genus and it and the following species approach most closely to members of the genus Rhabdophloeus in shape of the pronotum and possessing a carinate sublateral line.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.