Figitinae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.210723 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6166787 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D4087D1-3B08-C500-83D2-54A5FA117765 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Figitinae |
status |
|
Key to genera of Figitinae + Melanips
1. Scutellum View in CoL ending in a point ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 A,B) or with spine ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 C,F)............................................... 2
- Scutellum View in CoL rounded, lacking spine ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C, 5A,E,I)........................................................ 4
2. Notauli with transverse carinae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D); mesoscutum coriaceous at least in basal area next to notauli ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D). Interfoveal carina below foveae level. Radial cell closed. Face entirely sculptured in both sexes ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G)..... Xyalophora Kieffer, 1901
- Notauli smooth; mesoscutum smooth ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 E). Interfoveal carina at same level as foveae or higher and forming a sharp tooth ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 F). Radial cell open ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 K) or partially open ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 J); face in male with two shiny and smooth areas ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 H), and in female with irradiating strigae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 I).................................................................... 3
3. Scutellum View in CoL wrinkled and ending in a very short spine 1/10 or less length of scutellum View in CoL ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 B). Wings glabrous; radial cell partially open ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 J). Male antenna with F1 longer than remaining flagellomeres.................................................................................................... Xyalophoroides Jiménez & Pujade-Villar, 2008
- Scutellum View in CoL carinate ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 C) or rarely smooth ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A) and ending in a spine usually 1/3 of length of scutellum View in CoL ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 C,F), though rarely very short ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A). Wings with setae on disc and margin; radial cell open ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 K), sometimes with R1 not reaching wing margin. Male antenna with F1 subequal or smaller than remaining flagellomeres..... Neralsia Cameron, 1883
4. Metasomal T3 with dense patch of setae laterally just behind T2 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 G)........................................ 5
- Metasomal T3 glabrous, without setae or with a very few sparse setae ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 H,L)................................. 11
5. Mesoscutum smooth or at most coriaceous in basal area next to notauli, sparsely pubescent with some disperse punctation ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 A,B).......................................................................................... 6
- Mesoscutum rugose, with uniformly distributed pubescence ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 E, 4C)........................................ 9
6. Scutellum View in CoL with one large squared fovea, though sometimes with a low carina at bottom of fovea ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A). Female antenna with distal segments very enlarged ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D)........................................... Lonchidia Thomson, 1861
- Scutellum View in CoL with two distinct rounded foveae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E). Female antenna with distal segments not enlarged ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B)........ 7
7. Radial cell open. Scutellum View in CoL smooth, with circumscutellar carina ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 B). Female metasoma shorter than head + mesosoma, not compressed, hypopygium not prominent.............................................. Paraschiza Weld, 1944
- Radial cell closed. Scutellum View in CoL rugose, with or without circumscutellar carina. Female metasoma as long as or longer than head + mesosoma, very compressed, hypopygium very prominent ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E)............................................ 8
8. Antenna 14-segmented in both sexes. Male F1 excavated. Areolet faintly indicated. Face striate.. Sarothrioides Belizin, 1961
- Antenna 13-segmented in female. Male F1 sometimes not excavated. Areolet present. Face smooth or sometimes punctate or coriaceous-punctate, but never striate...................................................................... 9
9. Notauli present..................................................................... Sarothrus Hartig, 1840
- Notauli absent.................................................................... Amphitectus Hartig, 1840
10. Veins of radial cell hyaline, not nebulous ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 G). Areolet present ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 G). Head sub-quadrangular ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 F). Scutellum View in CoL without circumscutellar carina ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 C)................... Melanips Walker, 1835 (currently included in the Aspicerinae )
- Veins of radial cell nebulous ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F). Areolet absent ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F). Head subtriangular ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 A). Scutellum View in CoL with circumscutellar carina ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 E).............................................. Nebulovena Pujade-Villar & Paretas-Martínez, 2011
11. Compound eyes glabrous ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B)....................................................................... 12
- Compound eyes pubescent ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 C)..................................................................... 13
12. Radial cell open. Mesosoma smooth or with only some piliferous points ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A). Mesopleuron smooth ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A)........................................................................................... Trischiza Förster, 1869
- Radial cell closed. Mesosoma coriaceous with piliferous points and in females rugose-coriaceous laterally. Mesopleuron coriaceous with carinae basally............................................................. Seitneria Tavares, 1928
13. Scutellum View in CoL smooth. Head in dorsal view very long, sub-spherical ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 D). Metasomal T2 smooth..... Zygosis Förster, 1869
- Scutellum View in CoL rugose, at least partially. Head in dorsal view not very long. Metasomal T2 sometimes carinate.............. 14
14. Female antenna longer, F2–9 longer than wide; F 1 in males filiform, not or only slightly modified. Pronotum carinate, at least basally ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 E). Mesosoma with sparse bristly setae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 E). Mesopleuron striate, sometimes with a small smooth area ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 E). Radial cell sometimes partially open ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 F). Anterior half of metasomal T 2 in female usually striate, but not always in male ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 H)....................................................................... Figites Latreille, 1802
- Female antenna shorter, F2–9 very short, as long as wide ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 K); F 1 in males curved, strongly modified ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 J). Pronotum smooth ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 I). Mesosoma with abundant lying setae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 I). Mesopleuron mostly smooth, with carinae in lower half ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 I). Radial cell closed ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 G). Metasomal T2 smooth ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 L)............................. Homorus Förster, 1869
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.