Pseudosperma neglectum (E. Horak, Matheny & Desjardin) Haelew., 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.69.33563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D7286CA-1A37-57DC-9F0C-3DEC35B729F3 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pseudosperma neglectum (E. Horak, Matheny & Desjardin) Haelew. |
status |
comb. nov. |
Pseudosperma neglectum (E. Horak, Matheny & Desjardin) Haelew. comb. nov.
≡ Inocybe neglecta E. Horak, Matheny & Desjardin, Phytotaxa 230(3): 208 (2015). [Basionym]
Note.
The combination of I. neglecta in genus Pseudosperma is made, based on phylogenetic evidence. Horak et al. (2015) presented the phylogenetic reconstruction of an nrLSU dataset and found high statistical support for the Pseudosperma clade ( fide Matheny 2005) including P. neglectum . While P. neglectum was retrieved as sister to the remaining members of the Pseudosperma clade, there was no support for this relationship. The same result was also found by Kropp et al. (2013). In addition, blasting the ITS sequence of the holotype (GenBank acc. no. EU600829) against sequences from type materials, resulted in P. occidentale (Kropp, Matheny & Hutchison) Matheny & Esteve-Rav. and P. illudens (Matheny, Bougher & G.M. Gates) Matheny & Esteve-Rav. with the highest percentages of identity (96.46% and 96.28%, respectively).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudosperma neglectum (E. Horak, Matheny & Desjardin) Haelew.
Saba, Malka, Haelewaters, Danny, Pfister, Donald H. & Khalid, Abdul Nasir 2020 |
Inocybe neglecta
E. Horak, Matheny & Desjardin 2015 |