Leucoma costalis ( Moore, 1879 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5115.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:96A98403-B1DD-4671-8678-146940CF8686 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6362229 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9F503961-853F-FFA4-FF27-6E55FD11FE49 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Leucoma costalis ( Moore, 1879 ) |
status |
|
Leucoma costalis ( Moore, 1879)
( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1‒10 , 22 View FIGURES 19–24 )
Caragola costalis Moore, 1879: 46 .
Caviria costalis: Hampson, 1893: 491 .
Redoa costalis: Swinhoe, 1922: 463 .
Euzora costalis: Bryk, 1934: 122 .
Stilpnotia costalis: Chao, 1978: 55 .
Leucoma costalis: Swinhoe, 1906: 541 ; Chao, 2003: 292; Wang et al., 2015: 583.
Diagnosis. The species can be easily separated from its congeners by forewings acute apically, with a black edge at the basal area of costa; valvae wide basally, divided into two arms distally, the ventral arm deeply inward concave at terminal.
Material examined. 1♂, Tacheng Town, Weixi County, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture , Yunnan, 17.VII.2016,leg H.S. Wang . 1♂, Baotai Mountain, Yongping County, Baoshan City , Yunnan, 12.VIII.2018, leg S.Y. Huang .
Distribution. China (Sichuan, Yunnan), India.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Leucoma costalis ( Moore, 1879 )
Xie, Linzhe, Wang, Ming, Chen, Yusi & Wang, Houshuai 2022 |
costalis:
Chao, C. L. 1978: 55 |
costalis:
Bryk, F. 1934: 122 |
costalis:
Swinhoe, C. 1922: 463 |
Leucoma costalis: Swinhoe, 1906: 541
Wang, H. S. & Wahlberg, N. & Holloway, J. D. & Bergsten, J. & Fan, X. L. & Janzen, D. H. & Hallwachs, W. & Wen, L. J. & Wang, M. & Nylin, S. 2015: 583 |
Chao, C. L. 2003: 292 |
Swinhoe, C. 1906: 541 |
costalis:
Hampson, G. F. 1893: 491 |
costalis
Moore, F. 1879: 46 |