Oodini LaFerte-Senectere , 1851

Will, Kipling, 2015, Resolution of taxonomic problems in Australian Harpalini, Abacetini, Pterostichini, and Oodini (Coleoptera, Carabidae), ZooKeys 545, pp. 131-137 : 134

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.545.6752

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3376A343-C4E4-4660-B9D3-07B7113FF93E

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A0538029-B696-BB29-3659-5108B2A58D57

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Oodini LaFerte-Senectere , 1851
status

 

Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Carabidae

Oodini LaFerte-Senectere, 1851 View in CoL

Nanodiodes lilliputana (W.J. Macleay, 1888)

Anatrichis lilliputana W.J. Macleay, 1888

Material Examined.

Syntypes [ANIC], type locality, King Sound, Western Australia. Additional material in ANIC and WAM examined.

Notes.

Nanodiodes Bousquet, 1996 was proposed by Bousquet (1996) to replace Nanodes Habu, 1956 and he moved all species that where included by Moore et al. (1987) in Anatrichus LeConte, 1853 into this genus except for Anatrichis lilliputana , which Bousquet had not studied. Although some subsequent catalogs (e.g., Lorenz 2005) treated this species as Nanodiodes lilliputana , there is no indication that the character states were confirmed. I examined the syntypes and found the following: submentum with pairs of setae at the lateral edge; mesocoxa with a posterior seta and; metatrochanter without a seta. This combination is consistent with Nanodiodes , confirming that it shares the putative synapomorphic character states with species currently included in that genus. Anatrichis is therefore not found in the Australian fauna.