Sphenarium borrei Bolivar, 1884
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.804182 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:27748C60-F64A-4E2C-B5CD-8DB413480DF4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6029394 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A12C6E25-AC2B-3B45-2CBE-D000FF5FACE1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sphenarium borrei Bolivar, 1884 |
status |
|
Sphenarium borrei Bolivar, 1884 View in CoL
(http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera .speciesfile.org:TaxonName:37036)
Sphenarium bruneri Bolivar, 1909 View in CoL
Description. External morphology ( Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 D, E, F, G; 15G, H): total body length ranging from 26.82 to 31.76 mm in females and from 21.08 to 30.62 mm in males; antennae filiform, notably shorter in females or slightly longer in males than head and pronotum together; head conical notably longer than wide and with oval eyes in both sexes; fastigium moderately elongated, nearly half the length of interocular space in females or notably elongated, nearly as long as the interocular space in males; tegmina spatula-like in both sexes; subgenital plate of males rounded moderately developed posteriorly; dorsal ovipositor valves lanceolate, notably elongated towards the apex. Male genitalia: bridge of epiphallus as long as the length of lateral plates ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D-I). Ectophallus in dorsal view ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D-II) broad at the base, with lateral borders of ramus convergent; basal emargination of cingulum notably developed towards the base reducing completely the interspace between the apodemal plates. Ectophallus in posterior view ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 E) with a conspicuous sclerotized hollow in the sheath notably closed; inflections of supraramus notably developed anterolaterally; valves of cingulum triangular, stout and notably developed posteriorly ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 F). Endophallus in lateral view ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D-III) with a short pseudoarch tightly joined to the valves of cingulum; aedeagal valves very small, tapered in the apex without apical spine; aedeagal valves and sclerites about ¾ the length of dorsal inflections of endophallic apodemes.
Colouration. Ground colours vary from green, yellow or brown. Body uniformly coloured or with the following colour traits ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 G, H): antennae frequently black or brown; fastigium often reddish to pinkish; lateral postocular bands frequently present, narrow, yellowish, whitish or pinkish; dorsomedial line absent; dorsal shades sometimes absent, if present almost entirely restricted to the head, metanotum and abdomen apex, brown or black; lateral shades often present, black or dark brown, principally restricted to head and pronotum; lateral bands of blotches absent; ventral bands of pronotum often present, narrow and pinkish; frequently posterior margin of pronotum pinkish; mesonotum is partially or entirely black; tegmina green, black or magenta; lateral blotches of 1st abdominal segment absent; fore and middle femora pinkish; sometimes hind femora with upper and lower medial areas black and whitish, respectively; knees of hind femora laterally black, dorsally reddish; hind tibia frequently black.
Diagnosis. Externally this species sometimes resembles S. purpurascens and S. infernalis sp.n. However, S. borrei differs from these species principally by its notably elongated head (conical in both sexes) and dorsal ovipositor valves, as well as its pinkish colourations in the ventral and posterior margins of pronotum when present. At the level of male genitalia, S. borrei more closely resembles other species with a conspicuous sclerotized hollow in the sheath (all species described below). Nevertheless, S. borrei differs from other species in the genus by the following combination of male genitalia characters: lateral borders of ramus convergent, basal emargination of cingulum notably developed, sclerotized hollow of the sheath conspicuous and closed, inflections of supraramus notably developed anterolaterally, valves of cingulum triangular and stout, posteriorly developed, and aedeagal valves very small.
Distribution. This species is distributed in elevations ranging from 304 to 2225 m a.s.l. and is principally restricted to the western portion of the Mexican Volcanic Belt in Colima, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacan, Nayarit and Zacatecas, Mexico ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A).
Material examined. S. borrei : lectotype m ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 D) and paralectotype f ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 E), from Mexico: Guanajuato (E. Duges); designation: Kevan (1960, unpublished results); location: Royal Institute of Natural Sciences of Belgium (RISCNB), Brusseles, Belgium . S. bruneri : lectotype m ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 F) and paralectotype f ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 G), from Mexico (Coneradt); designation: Kevan (1960, unpublished results); location: Spanish Institute of Entomology (SIE), Madrid, Spain. We could only examine the external morphology of all these type specimens. Additional material: 214 m, 178 f from 65 localities (Appendix Table 5).
Taxonomic discussion. Bolivar (1884) originally described this species from one male and female syntypes from Guanajuato, Mexico. He recognized this species based on the morphology of head, antenna and ovipositor valves, as well as coloration patterns. For posterior taxonomic studies this species remain valid until Márquez (1962) synonymised it as S. purpurascens despite he did not examined specimens of this species. Later , Boyle (1974) re-established the status of this species and this status remain stable for posterior molecular analysis ( Pedraza-lara et al. 2015; Sanabria-Urbán et al. 2015). According to our results, S. borrei is the most differentiated species in the genus in both morphological and genetic characters. Moreover, its well-supported monophyly and geographic restrictiveness support his recognition as a valid species.
Sphenarium bruneri View in CoL was only briefly described based on unstated number of specimens ( Bolivar 1909), probably one male and two females from an unspecified Mexican locality. Originally, Bolivar (1909) stated a close relationship between this species and S. rugosum View in CoL . However, he mainly considered highly variable external traits in differentiating S. brunerri from its congeners. The validity of S. bruneri View in CoL is questionable and its taxonomic position has remained uncertain. This species has been considered as a synonym of S. histrio ( Boyle 1974) View in CoL or S. purpurascens ( Kevan 1977) View in CoL . Nevertheless, considering the close resemblance in the morphology of head, tegmina and ovipositor valves between S. borrei View in CoL and S. bruneri View in CoL , it is probable that S. bruneri View in CoL represents a junior synonym of S. borrei View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sphenarium borrei Bolivar, 1884
Sanabria-Urbán, Salomón, Song, Hojun, Oyama, Ken, González-Rodríguez, Antonio & Castillo, Raúl Cueva Del 2017 |
S. purpurascens (
Kevan 1977 |
S. histrio (
Boyle 1974 |
Sphenarium bruneri
Bolivar 1909 |