Gnaphosa prashkevichi, Fomichev, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4706.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FEBC17B9-F1C7-4DCC-AD2E-AE2D0A22E811 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E5FBF6CE-6665-46F2-A358-2920653CC520 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:E5FBF6CE-6665-46F2-A358-2920653CC520 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gnaphosa prashkevichi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Gnaphosa prashkevichi View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 3, 6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 9, 12 View FIGURES 7–12 , 15, 18, 21 View FIGURES 13–21 , 22–25 View FIGURES 22–25 .
Types. Holotype ♂ ( ISEA) KAZAKHSTAN, Almaty Region, Burkhansartau Mountain Range , 44°33’N, 79°56’E, pebble bank of dry river, 2400 m, 27.06.2016 (A.A. Fomichev) GoogleMaps . Paratype: 1♀ ( ISEA) together with the holotype .
Etymology. The specific name is a patronym taken in honour of my friend, the well-known Russian science fiction writer Gennadiy M. Prashkevich (Novosibirsk, Russia).
Diagnosis. The new species is similar to G. aksuensis sp. n., G. khovdensis , G. mataica sp. n., and G. rasnitsyni ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ). The male of G. prashkevichi sp. n. can be separated from all aforementioned species in having the embolic spine directed ventrally (vs anteriorly, prolaterally, or retrolaterally). Male of G. prashkevichi sp. n. can be distinguished from G. aksuensis sp. n. and G. mataica sp. n. in that the base of embolus starts with posterior 1/5 of bulbus (vs with posterior 1/3 of bulbus). In addition, the male of new species differs from G. khovdensis and G. rasnitsyni in having the embolus with a strongly curved apex (straight apex in similar species). The female of G. prashkevichi sp. n. is similar to those of G. aksuensis sp. n., G. mataica sp. n. G. rasnitsyni , and G. serzonsteini but can be distinguished by having the epigynal fovea 1.5 times longer than wide (fovea as long as wide in similar species). In addition, the new species differs from G. aksuensis sp. n. and G. mataica sp. n. in the absence of bulges, which are well developed in the former two species. As opposed to G. rasnitsyni and G. serzonsteini , the new species has the scape with an abrupt posterior margin (vs concave posterior margin).
Description. Male (holotype). Total length 11.5. Carapace: 5.4 long, 4.25 wide. Carapace and sternum brown. Chelicerae, labium and maxillae dark brown. Palps and legs yellow. Abdomen yellow-gray with brown dorsal scutum. Spinnerets yellow.
Leg measurements:
Leg spination:
Palp as in Figs 3, 6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 9, 12 View FIGURES 7–12 , 15 View FIGURES 13–21 ; tibial apophysis relatively short (shorter than tibia), with sharply pointed tip bent posteriorly; tegular apophysis almost straight; embolus straight with strongly curved apex; prolateral edge of embolus serrated and bears narrow lamina; base of embolus elongated, starts with posterior 1/5 of bulbus; upper part of embolic base bearing thin spine directed ventrally.
Female. Total length 11.0. Carapace: 5.5 long, 4.05 wide. Carapace and sternum light-brown. Chelicerae, labium and maxillae dark brown. Palps yellow with dark-brown Ta. Legs yellow. Legs I–II with brown Ta. Abdomen yellow-gray. Spinnerets yellow.
Leg measurements:
Epigyne as in Figs 18, 21 View FIGURES 13–21 ; fovea 1.5 times longer than wide, without well-developed bulges; scape longer than wide, with abrupt posterior margin; lateral margins of the fovea with long and wide pockets, at an angle of about 60° to epigastral fold; heads of receptacles directed anteriorly. Distribution. Known from the type locality only.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |