Megalopta yanomami, Santos & Melo, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2014.946106 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4333954 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A26E87DD-197B-295E-7580-FCDEFEE7FA2B |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Megalopta yanomami |
status |
sp. nov. |
Megalopta yanomami sp. n.
( Figures 1C View Figure 1 , 4A View Figure 4 , 5E View Figure 5 , 6B View Figure 6 , 10C View Figure 10 , 12D View Figure 12 , 13C, D View Figure 13 , 15C View Figure 15 )
Diagnosis
Differs from M. piraha by the basal area of metapostnotum with longitudinal rugulosities restricted to mid portion, external rugulosities strongly impressed and forming semicircles, the integument often dark green ( Figure 4A View Figure 4 ); metanotum with contiguous punctation ( Figure 5E View Figure 5 ); T1 densely punctured (<1 pd). The male also differs by the scape uniformly enlarged ( Figures 10C View Figure 10 , 13C View Figure 13 ) and by flagellomeres with depressed and glabrous area ( Figures 10C View Figure 10 , 13D View Figure 13 ).
Description
Female. (1) Mandible bidentate and with supplementary teeth. (2) Labral elevation with lateral sides slightly raised in relation to central area. (3) Clypeus with surface between punctures on basal and central area smooth. (4) Central portion of supraclypeal area with dense punctation, the punctures separated by <1 pd, except by a small impunctate area in the centre of the lower portion. (5) Antenna reddish brown. (6) Upper frons flat, not strongly declivous toward sulcus around median ocellus. (7) Ocellocular distance smaller than the F1 length. (8) Mesoscutum adjacent to the parapsidial line densely punctured, punctures contiguous, punctation becoming sparser towards mesoscutal lip (<1 pd). (9) Scutellum with posterior margin raised in relation to anterior margin of metanotum. (10) Metanotum with integument, in oblique view, not hidden by short plumose pilosity, with contiguous punctation ( Figure 5E View Figure 5 ). (11) Basal area of metapostnotum metallic green, its length up to 0.7× that of metanotum, with longitudinal rugulosities restricted to central area ( Figures 4A View Figure 4 , 5E View Figure 5 ). (12) Mesepisternum with contiguous punctation. (13) Metepisternum with sparse pilosity, integument visible through pilosity; posterior upper margin of metepisternum unmodified, lacking a velvety process ( Figure 1C View Figure 1 ). (14) T1 with dorsal surface of disc with contiguous to dense punctation (<1 pd), posterior marginal zone smooth between punctures. Male. (15) Scape uniformly enlarged ( Figures 10C View Figure 10 , 13C View Figure 13 ). (16) Flagellum reddish brown ( Figure 10C View Figure 10 ), F1–F11 not differing in diameter but with depressed and glabrous area in frontal view ( Figures 10C View Figure 10 , 13D View Figure 13 ); F2 about as long as F3 ( Figure 10C View Figure 10 ); F6–F11, in anterior view, with the anterior and posterior margins depressed, in posterior view with basal glabrous area at same level of remaining surface. (17) Metanotum with integument, in dorsal view, not hidden by short plumose pilosity. (19) Basal area of metapostnotum dark metallic green, its length up to 0.8× that of metanotum, longitudinal rugulosities strongly impressed and enclosed laterally by two sulci ( Figure 12D View Figure 12 ). (20) Metepisternum. As described for the female. (21) 1st and 2nd tarsomeres of foreleg with longest simple setae shorter than summed length of the three apical tarsomeres. (22) S3 with longitudinal sulcus, posterolateral margin notched. (23) S4 with medial protruding process, profile of process widely triangular in lateral view; basal portion glabrous; posterolateral margin notched, notch not extending to basal half of sclerite.
Measurements
Approximate body length: (11.5–14.2); maximum width of head: (3.5–4.5); intertegular distance: (3.2–4.4); length of forewing with tegula: (10.3–12.3).
Type material
Holotype female ( INPA): BRAZIL. Roraima: ‘BRASIL – Roraima \ Rio Uraricoera \ Ilha de Maracá \ 02–13.v.1987 ’ ‘ J.A. Rafael \ J.E.B. Brasil\ L.S. Aquino’ ‘ Armadilha \ de Malaise’ . Paratypes (9♀, 4♂): BRAZIL. Pará : ‘Brasil Pará \ Serra Norte \ N1 Est. Serraria \ 6-IX-1983 ’ ‘ Luz U. V .’ ‘ MPEG HYM \ 11005592’ (1♀, MPEG); ‘ Brasil Pará \ Serra Norte \ MANGÂNES\ C/ Luz \ 24-X-1984 ’ ‘ Brasil Pará \ T . Pimentel’ ‘ MPEG HYM \ 11005587’ (1♀, MPEG); ‘ Brasil Pará \ Serra Norte \ MANGÂNES\ COL. NOTURNA\ 06-IX-1985 ’ ‘ Brasil Pará \ Marcio Zanuto’ ‘ MPEG HYM \ 11005600’ (1♀, MPEG); ‘ Brasil Pará \ Serra Norte \ N2 CANGA \ 3-XI-1985 ’ ‘ Brasil Pará \ N. Bittencourt’ ‘ MPEG HYM \ 11005611’ (1♂, MPEG); ‘ Brasil Pará \ Serra Norte \ N1. Col. Luz \ 19-IX-1985 ’ ‘ Brasil Pará \ J. Dias’ ‘ MPEG HYM \ 11005596’ (1♂, MPEG) . Roraima: ‘ Brasil, Roraima, Amajari ,\ Tepequém , Trilha Igarapé \ da Anta 03°46 ′ 19.7 ″ N’ ‘ 61°45 ′ 21.6 ″ W 649m 14-\ mai-09 11:00 Grigio, Jr. O \ Salicilato’ ‘MIRR 12678’ (1♀, MIRR) GoogleMaps ;‘ BRASIL – Roraima \ Rio Uraricoera \ Ilha de Maracá \ 02–13. v.1987 ’ ‘ J.A. Rafael \ J.E.B. Brasil\ L.S. Aquino’ (4♀, INPA); ‘ Brasil : Roraima \ Rio Uraricoera \ Ilha de Maracá’ ‘ Armadilha \ de Luz’ ‘ 21-30.xi.1987 \ J.A. Rafael e\ equipe’ (1♀, INPA); ‘ Brasil Roraima \ Tepequém \ Pousada SESC \ 03°45 ′ 186 ″ N\ 61°42 ′ 959 ″ W’ ‘ 637m 14/vii.2009 \ M.L. Oliveira, O\ Mielke & M\ Casagrande leg’ (1♂, INPA); ‘ BR RR Uiramutã, Rio Wailã \ 043750/600946\ 22/III/2007 \ F.F. Xavier Filho, col.\ Luz Mista Mercúrio’ (1♂, INPA) .
Distribution
BRAZIL. Pará: Parauapebas. Roraima: Amajari, Uiramutã ( Figure 15C View Figure 15 ).
Etymology
The specific epithet honours the ‘Yanomami’, the name for an ethnic group of South American natives, used here as a noun in apposition. The ‘Yanomami’ comprise a society of hunter-agriculturists of the tropical rainforest of northern Amazonia, whose contact with non-indigenous society over most of their territory has been relatively recent. Their territory covers an area of approximately 192,000 km 2, located on both sides of the border between Brazil and Venezuela, in the Orinoco– Amazon interfluvial region (affluents of the right shore of the Rio Branco and left shore of the Rio Negro). The total population of the ‘Yanomami’ in Brazil and Venezuela is today estimated to be around 26,000 people ( Albert 1999).
The byroni species group
Diagnosis
The byroni group includes M. atlantica Santos & Silveira , M. guarani sp. n., M. xavante sp. n., M. mapinguari sp. n., M. purpurata Smith , M. karitiana sp. n. and additional species previously placed in the subgenus Megalopta (Noctoraptor) Engel, Brooks and Yanega. It is distinguished from other species groups by the ocellocular distance equal to length of F1 and by the sparsely punctured mesoscutum posteriorly to mesoscutal lip (≥ 1 pd). The female differs from those of other groups by lacking the mandibular subapical and supplementary teeth and the basal macula in the inner surface of the mandible. The male is characterized by the F2 as wide as about twothirds of F3, dorsal surface of flagellomeres flattened to slightly depressed and by the protruding process of S4, in lateral view, digitiform or triangular and short. It is shown here that this group also contains species with a metallic green integument, differing from the previously described dark brown non-metallic species.
Bees in this group are rarely collected and most species are known from single specimens or small series. All known females in the byroni group have a morphology associated with non nest-making, parasitic behaviour. Biani and Wcislo (2007), in their work on M. byroni , consider that this group might behave as obligatory cleptoparasites or social parasites. Taking into consideration that female morphology in this group is more similar to that of macrocephalic females of nest-making species, it is more plausible to believe that they behave as social parasites. Macrocephalic females exhibit dominant queen-like behaviour over the non macrocephalic subordinate females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |